Skip to content

chore: [STMS-4062] Migrate js-tools to pnpm #198

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 31 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

SiriusCrain
Copy link

No description provided.

Comment on lines +16 to 19
- uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
with:
version: 10
- uses: umidbekk/actions/prepare-node-repo@v2
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SiriusCrain Did you have time to check if we can use prepare-node-repo@ without pnpm/action-setup? And can you replace umidbekk/actions/prepare-node-repo@v2 with superdispatch one?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will check

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I can replace umidbek's package, but since other workflows were requiring addin pnpm-action...

Comment on lines -46 to +44
"node": ">=12"
"node": ">=20"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SiriusCrain IIIRC, not all our repo require node>=20, and it could become a problem during migrations.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can update node version in our other repos, and then use upgraded js-tools build, for now we can use current (0.8.0)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants