Clear up the reference around let #29889
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @Manishearth (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
| loop body block executes and control returns to the pattern matching statement. | ||
| Otherwise, the while expression completes. | ||
| A `while let` loop is semantically identical to a `while` loop but in place of | ||
| a condition expression it expects `let` statement with a refuatble pattern. If |
|
r=me once the spelling is fixed |
steveklabnik
force-pushed
the
gh29801
branch
from
88a0da0 to
9ecdaa7
Compare
|
@bors: r=manishearth rollup |
|
📌 Commit 9ecdaa7 has been approved by |
| expression on the right hand side of the let statement matches the pattern, the corresponding | ||
| block will execute, otherwise flow proceeds to the first `else` block that follows. | ||
| An `if let` expression is semantically identical to an `if` expression but in | ||
| place of a condition expression it expects a `let` statement with a refuatble |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: refuatable --> refutable
steveklabnik
force-pushed
the
gh29801
branch
from
9ecdaa7 to
cf384c2
Compare
|
@bors: r=manishearth rollup |
|
📌 Commit cf384c2 has been approved by |
First, re-word the section on if let/while let to be more clear. Second, actually call them let statements in the statement section Fixes rust-lang#29801
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2015
First, re-word the section on if let/while let to be more clear. Second, actually call them let statements in the statement section Fixes rust-lang#29801
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2015
First, re-word the section on if let/while let to be more clear. Second, actually call them let statements in the statement section Fixes rust-lang#29801
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First, re-word the section on if let/while let to be more clear.
Second, actually call them let statements in the statement section
Fixes #29801