Skip to content

housekeeping: ignore cla github labels otherwise release will break #1430

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2017

Conversation

ghuntley
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

housekeeping

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

DNF labels would cause GRM to fail/we would not be able to release.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Ignore all DNF labels

What might this PR break?

This will unbreak the release of v8.0.0; haven't discovered this yet because no releases have been done since joining the .NET foundation. GRM has a limitation (GitTools/GitReleaseManager#90) where an issue can only belong to one label.

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

Other information:

@ghuntley ghuntley added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 20, 2017
@dnfclas
Copy link

dnfclas commented Aug 20, 2017

@ghuntley,
Thanks for having already signed the Contribution License Agreement. Your agreement was validated by .NET Foundation. We will now review your pull request.
Thanks,
.NET Foundation Pull Request Bot

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 8e3ecbc on ignore-dotnet-foundaiton-labels into ** on develop**.

@ghuntley ghuntley merged commit 72b4921 into develop Aug 20, 2017
@ghuntley ghuntley deleted the ignore-dotnet-foundaiton-labels branch August 20, 2017 12:52
@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 26, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants