-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
Fix typo in test_dataclasses.py #95735
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
`dataclass` was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator. (I don't believe this needs an issue or a news entry)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch!
Thanks @da-woods for the PR, and @ericvsmith for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11. |
`dataclass` was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator. (cherry picked from commit 59e09ef) Co-authored-by: da-woods <[email protected]>
GH-95740 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
`dataclass` was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator. (cherry picked from commit 59e09ef) Co-authored-by: da-woods <[email protected]>
GH-95741 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
`dataclass` was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator. (cherry picked from commit 59e09ef) Co-authored-by: da-woods <[email protected]>
`dataclass` was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator. (cherry picked from commit 59e09ef) Co-authored-by: da-woods <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: da-woods <[email protected]>
`dataclass` was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator.
dataclass
was called as a function when it was almost certainly intended to be a decorator.(I don't believe this needs an issue or a news entry)