Skip to content

Merge master into plaidml/plaidml-v1 #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3,211 commits into from
May 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

flaub
Copy link

@flaub flaub commented May 20, 2020

No description provided.

jayfoad and others added 30 commits May 15, 2020 18:14
Remove Use::setPrev. It provided no value because it had the same
accessibility as the underlying field Prev, and there was no
corresponding setNext anyway.

Simplify Use::removeFromList.
Avoid repeated isa<> and cast<> by just performing a dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>
It is possible for optimizations to create SSA code which violates
the dominance property in unreachable blocks.  Equivalently, dominance
computed using normal mechanisms is undefined in unreachable blocks.

See discussion here: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-allowing-dialects-to-relax-the-ssa-dominance-condition/833/51

This patch only checks the dominance condition inside blocks which are
reachable from the the entry block of their region.  Note that the
dominance conditions of regions contained in an unreachable block are
still checked.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79922
The "null-pointer-is-valid" attribute needs to be checked by many
pointer-related combines. To make the check more efficient, convert
it from a string into an enum attribute.

In the future, this attribute may be replaced with data layout
properties.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78862
This fixes bot failure seen in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-win-x-armv7l/builds/7378
by adding `REQUIRES: x86_64-linux` to the test case
BuildMI requires this debug loc to be from the same sub program as the variable metadata passed in.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D80019
DimOp folding is using bare accesses to underlying SubViewOp operands.
This is generally incorrect and is fixed in this revision.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80017
Summary:
Move instructions that have recently been implemented in V8 from the
`unimplemented-simd128` target feature to the `simd128` target
feature. The updated instructions match the update at
WebAssembly/simd#223.

Reviewers: aheejin

Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79973
…compiler

Since we're using the new testing format, DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is not passed
to the compiler -- it's only passed to the programs we run as an argument
to the %{exec} substitution.
This fixes bot failure seen in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-win-x-armv7l/builds/7378
by adding `REQUIRES: x86_64-linux` to the test case
Summary:
First, compact implementation of lowering to LLVM IR. A bit more
challenging than the constant mask due to the dynamic indices, of course.
I like to hear if there are more efficient ways of doing this in LLVM,
but this for now at least gives us a functional reference implementation.

Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, ftynse, bkramer, reidtatge, andydavis1, mehdi_amini

Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79954
…e. no compatibility burden)

Announced on https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141416.html

Similar to D79371, but for `multiclass B` (convenience helper for defining --foo and --no-foo)

Some changed options are also used by gold, but I haven't seen their
one-dash use cases outside of lld's testsuite.
A new utils library named 'fputil' is added. This library is used in
math tests and the MPFR wrapper. The math implementations will be
modified to use this library in a later round.

Reviewers: phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79724
We already set it using -rpath when linking test executables, and using
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH causes problems when running other commands that
shouldn't run against the just-built libc++ (e.g. `ls` in a ShTest).

rdar://63241847
It doesn't appear to be needed anymore with the Clang on our build bots.
Only add CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS when in a standalone bulid.
Or else CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS contains flags for build compiler of Clang/llvm.
This might not be the same as what the COMPILER_RT_TEST_COMPILER supports.
eg: the build compiler use lld linker and we use it to build clang with
default ld linker then to be tested clang will complain about lld
options like --color-diagnostics.

Reviewed By: phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78373
This should not be allowed to change the address space of the source
and result, so the pointer types should match. The only emitter of
this seems to be a disable clang change, so no tests to update.
Reviewers: deadalnix, efriedma, rengolin, jyknight, joerg

Reviewed By: joerg

Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79915
This unifies SETCC operations along the lines of other operations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79975
This is fixing a thinLTO module collision issue for thin archives. The problem is that we always use a zero offset to name members in a thin archive and that causes the following build error:

    ld.lld: error: Expected at most one ThinLTO module per bitcode file

which happens to a thin archive that has two members with the same object file name (whose paths will be ignored by thinLTO driver)

The fix here is to use real member offset instead as is done for non-thin archives.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79880
Summary:
This new custom DAG combine fixes a codegen issue with the
wasm_simd128.h intrinsics. Clang lowers the

  return (v128_t)(__f32x4){__a, __a, __a, __a};

body of f32x4_splat to a splat shuffle of a bitcasted vector, as seen
in the new simd-shuffle-bitcast.ll test. The bitcast interfered with
the target-independent DAG combine that combines splat shuffles into
BUILD_VECTOR nodes, so this patch introduces a new custom DAG combine
to hoist the bitcast out of the shuffle, allowing the
target-independent combine to work as intended.

Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80021
This has been duplicated since before
2372a19, but that commit has it
appearing twice in the space of 10 lines of the same function body. It
could also be hoisted up to the point just after where the last
special-case is considered, but I want to keep the intent of the
original authors.

Committed as obvious without a review.
Summary:
I forgot to include a test in this commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG379e68a763097bed55556c6dc7453e4b732e3d68

Here's the test. It passes after that commit and fails before that commit.

Reviewed By: mattdr

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79894
This is D77454, except for stores.  All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
…-related APIs""

This reverts commit 454de99.

The problem was that one of the ctor arguments of CallAnalyzer was left
to be const std::function<>&. A function_ref was passed for it, and then
the ctor stored the value in a function_ref field. So a std::function<>
would be created as a temporary, and not survive past the ctor
invocation, while the field would.

Tested locally by following https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/SanitizerBotReproduceBuild

Original Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79917
Reviewers: efriedma, sdesmalen, c-rhodes, hfinkel

Reviewed By: c-rhodes

Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, tschuett, hiraditya, kbarton, rkruppe, psnobl, shchenz, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79821
Reviewers: efriedma, fpetrogalli, kmclaughlin, grosbach, dmgreen

Reviewed By: dmgreen

Subscribers: tschuett, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, dmgreen, danielkiss, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79816
RKSimon and others added 22 commits May 19, 2020 09:28
Replace with forward declarations and move includes down to source files where required.

I also needed to move the TargetLoweringObjectFile::SectionForGlobal wrapper implementation down into TargetLoweringObjectFile.cpp
We don't need use compiler specific attributes so don't need Compiler.h
… possible.

Reviewers: hokein

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80154
Summary:
These files tend to be hand-authored, and people get very confused.
I can't think of any reason that such whitespace would be intended.

Reviewers: kadircet

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80160
gcc complained with:

/data/repo/master/clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/Ref.h:189:2: warning: extra ';' [-Wpedantic]
 }; // namespace llvm
  ^
For describing section/symbol names we can use unique suffixes,
e.g:

```
- Name: '.foo [1]`
- Name: '.foo [2]`
```

It can be a problem (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D79984#inline-734829),
because `[]` are sometimes used to describe a macros:

```
- Name: "[[a0]]"
```

Seems the better approach is to use something else, like "()".
This patch does it and refactors the code related.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80123
Use forward declaration instead.

Remove unnecessary BitVector forward declaration while we're here - we need to include BitVector.h.
…to LLVM IR

Summary:
This patch adds support for flush operation in OpenMP dialect and translation of this construct to LLVM IR.
The OpenMP IRBuilder is used for this translation.
The patch includes code changes and testcase modifications.

Reviewed By: ftynse, kiranchandramohan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79937
Summary:
Extract prefix filters to CodeComplete so it can be easily tested.

Fixes clangd/clangd#366

Reviewers: adamcz

Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79456
Summary: Example: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VZKGetSUTTDe9p4ooIETmdcwUod1_aE3vgD0E9x7HhI/edit

Reviewers: kadircet

Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79678
Add helper functions for 32-bit and 64-bit integer types.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80111
Reviewers: herhut

Reviewed By: herhut

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80118
… early return if the argument is symbolic

The very essence of MallocChecker lies in 2 overload sets: the FreeMemAux
functions and the MallocMemAux functions. The former houses most of the error
checking as well (aside from leaks), such as incorrect deallocation. There, we
check whether the argument's MemSpaceRegion is the heap or unknown, and if it
isn't, we know we encountered a bug (aside from a corner case patched by
@balazske in D76830), as specified by MEM34-C.

In ReallocMemAux, which really is the combination of  FreeMemAux and
MallocMemAux, we incorrectly early returned if the memory argument of realloc is
non-symbolic. The problem is, one of the cases where this happens when we know
precisely what the region is, like an array, as demonstrated in the test file.
So, lets get rid of this false negative :^)

Side note, I dislike the warning message and the associated checker name, but
I'll address it in a later patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79415
Use llvm_unreachable as typeName(Metric::MetricType T) should handle all enum values.
r119493 protected against PHINode::hasConstantValue returning the PHI
node itself, but a later fix in r159687 means that can never happen, so
the workarounds are no longer required.
Summary:
Added parsing/sema/serialization support for affinity clause in task
directives.

Reviewers: jdoerfert

Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, arphaman, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, caomhin

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80148
@flaub flaub requested a review from jbruestle May 20, 2020 02:37
@flaub flaub self-assigned this May 20, 2020
@flaub
Copy link
Author

flaub commented May 20, 2020

Copy link

@jbruestle jbruestle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Accepting based on the working build, since it's too big to review.

@flaub flaub merged commit b684916 into plaidml/plaidml-v1 May 20, 2020
@flaub flaub deleted the flaub-llvm-bump branch May 20, 2020 06:22
haoyouab pushed a commit to Flex-plaidml-team/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2020
When `Target::GetEntryPointAddress()` calls `exe_module->GetObjectFile()->GetEntryPointAddress()`, and the returned
`entry_addr` is valid, it can immediately be returned.

However, just before that, an `llvm::Error` value has been setup, but in this case it is not consumed before returning, like is done further below in the function.

In https://bugs.freebsd.org/248745 we got a bug report for this, where a very simple test case aborts and dumps core:

```
* thread plaidml#1, name = 'testcase', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
    frame #0: 0x00000000002018d4 testcase`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffea18) at testcase.c:3:5
   1	int main(int argc, char *argv[])
   2	{
-> 3	    return 0;
   4	}
(lldb) p argc
Program aborted due to an unhandled Error:
Error value was Success. (Note: Success values must still be checked prior to being destroyed).

Thread 1 received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3
3	thr_kill.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  thr_kill () at thr_kill.S:3
plaidml#1  0x00000008049a0004 in __raise (s=6) at /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/raise.c:52
plaidml#2  0x0000000804916229 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:67
plaidml#3  0x000000000451b5f5 in fatalUncheckedError () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Error.cpp:112
plaidml#4  0x00000000019cf008 in GetEntryPointAddress () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h:267
plaidml#5  0x0000000001bccbd8 in ConstructorSetup () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:67
plaidml#6  0x0000000001bcd2c0 in ThreadPlanCallFunction () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanCallFunction.cpp:114
plaidml#7  0x00000000020076d4 in InferiorCallMmap () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/InferiorCallPOSIX.cpp:97
plaidml#8  0x0000000001f4be33 in DoAllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/FreeBSD/ProcessFreeBSD.cpp:604
plaidml#9  0x0000000001fe51b9 in AllocatePage () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:347
plaidml#10 0x0000000001fe5385 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Memory.cpp:383
plaidml#11 0x0000000001974da2 in AllocateMemory () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2301
plaidml#12 CanJIT () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Process.cpp:2331
plaidml#13 0x0000000001a1bf3d in Evaluate () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/UserExpression.cpp:190
plaidml#14 0x00000000019ce7a2 in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp:2372
plaidml#15 0x0000000001ad784c in EvaluateExpression () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:414
plaidml#16 0x0000000001ad86ae in DoExecute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp:646
plaidml#17 0x0000000001a5e3ed in Execute () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandObject.cpp:1003
plaidml#18 0x0000000001a6c4a3 in HandleCommand () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1762
plaidml#19 0x0000000001a6f98c in IOHandlerInputComplete () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2760
plaidml#20 0x0000000001a90b08 in Run () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:548
plaidml#21 0x00000000019a6c6a in ExecuteIOHandlers () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Core/Debugger.cpp:903
plaidml#22 0x0000000001a70337 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:2946
plaidml#23 0x0000000001d9d812 in RunCommandInterpreter () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp:1169
plaidml#24 0x0000000001918be8 in MainLoop () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:675
plaidml#25 0x000000000191a114 in main () at /usr/src/contrib/llvm-project/lldb/tools/driver/Driver.cpp:890```

Fix the incorrect error catch by only instantiating an `Error` object if it is necessary.

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86355
rengolin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
…lvm#107294)

Random testing revealed it's possible to crash the analyzer with the
command line invocation:

clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=nullability empty.c

where the source file, empty.c is an empty source file.

```
clang: <root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.cpp:56:
   void clang::ento::CheckerManager::finishedCheckerRegistration():
     Assertion `Event.second.HasDispatcher && "No dispatcher registered for an event"' failed.

PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/

Stack dump:
0.      Program arguments: clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=nullability nullability-nocrash.c
 #0 ...
 ...
 #7 <addr> clang::ento::CheckerManager::finishedCheckerRegistration()
 #8 <addr> clang::ento::CheckerManager::CheckerManager(clang::ASTContext&,
             clang::AnalyzerOptions&, clang::Preprocessor const&,
             llvm::ArrayRef<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
             std::allocator<char>>>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (clang::ento::CheckerRegistry&)>>)
```

This commit removes the assertion which failed here, because it was
logically incorrect: it required that if an Event is handled by some
(enabled) checker, then there must be an **enabled** checker which can
emit that kind of Event. It should be OK to disable the event-producing
checkers but enable an event-consuming checker which has different
responsibilities in addition to handling the events.
 
Note that this assertion was in an `#ifndef NDEBUG` block, so this
change does not impact the non-debug builds.

Co-authored-by: Vince Bridgers <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.