Skip to content

Active incident status panel in the side menu #2033

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

samejr
Copy link
Member

@samejr samejr commented May 9, 2025

When we create an incident "status" in Betterstack, we now display a panel at the bottom of the side menu.

  • It displays for any status type except "operational"
  • Uses isManagedCloud hook to only for Cloud users
  • Caches the status using UnKey
  • The button links to our Status page for more information

CleanShot 2025-05-09 at 11 06 09

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added an incident status panel that displays real-time system status updates for managed cloud environments, with periodic automatic refreshes.
    • Integrated with BetterStack to fetch and display incident information, including a warning panel and direct link to an external status page when incidents are active.
  • Chores
    • Introduced new optional environment variables to support BetterStack integration.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 9, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 36fd278

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces BetterStack incident monitoring to the application. It adds a new service for fetching incident data from BetterStack, a loader and React component for displaying incident status, and updates the environment schema to support new configuration variables. The SideMenu layout is adjusted to include the new incident status panel.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
apps/webapp/app/services/betterstack/betterstack.server.ts New service module for BetterStack API interaction, including caching, error handling, and response validation.
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.incidents.tsx New route module with loader and IncidentStatusPanel React component for displaying incident status.
apps/webapp/app/env.server.ts Added optional environment variables for BetterStack integration to the environment schema.
apps/webapp/app/components/navigation/SideMenu.tsx Imported and rendered IncidentStatusPanel in SideMenu; adjusted component nesting and layout.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SideMenu
    participant IncidentStatusPanel
    participant Loader
    participant BetterStackClient
    participant BetterStackAPI

    User->>SideMenu: Renders
    SideMenu->>IncidentStatusPanel: Render
    IncidentStatusPanel->>Loader: useFetcher.load()
    Loader->>BetterStackClient: getIncidents()
    BetterStackClient->>BetterStackAPI: Fetch incidents
    BetterStackAPI-->>BetterStackClient: API response
    BetterStackClient-->>Loader: Incident data
    Loader-->>IncidentStatusPanel: JSON (isOperational)
    IncidentStatusPanel-->>User: Show incident status panel
    IncidentStatusPanel-->>Loader: Periodic refresh (every 1 min)
Loading

Poem

🐇
A cloud of caution floats above,
With BetterStack, we check and prove.
Incidents fetched and status clear,
Now users know when trouble's near.
The SideMenu shines with a warning bright—
All is well, or not tonight!
—Rabbit, on the status byte

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.incidents.tsx (1)

24-45: Optimize the useEffect dependency array

The empty dependency array in the useEffect may cause issues with the ESLint exhaustive-deps rule. The fetchIncidents function depends on fetcher, which could cause it to be stale in some edge cases.

Consider updating the dependency array to include fetchIncidents:

  useEffect(() => {
    fetchIncidents();

    const interval = setInterval(fetchIncidents, 60 * 1000); // 1 minute

    return () => clearInterval(interval);
-  }, []);
+  }, [fetchIncidents]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b1ad16 and 36fd278.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/webapp/app/components/navigation/SideMenu.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/webapp/app/env.server.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.incidents.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/webapp/app/services/betterstack/betterstack.server.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
apps/webapp/app/env.server.ts (1)

724-727: LGTM: Environment variables for BetterStack integration

The addition of these optional environment variables for BetterStack integration looks good. They're properly marked as optional and grouped under a relevant comment section.

apps/webapp/app/components/navigation/SideMenu.tsx (3)

20-20: Approved: Removed unused import

Good cleanup by removing the unused useLocation import.


34-34: LGTM: Added IncidentStatusPanel import

The new import for the IncidentStatusPanel component is correctly added.


283-295: Well-integrated UI component for incident notification

The IncidentStatusPanel is nicely integrated into the SideMenu layout, placed at the bottom before the Help and Usage components. The restructuring of the container elements maintains proper organization and styling.

apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.incidents.tsx (1)

11-22: LGTM: Loader implementation for incident status

The loader properly instantiates the BetterStackClient, fetches incident data, and returns a clean JSON response with operational status. Good default to operational (true) if the fetch fails.

apps/webapp/app/services/betterstack/betterstack.server.ts (4)

7-17: LGTM: Well-defined schema for incident data

The Zod schema for validating incident data is well-structured and exports a proper type for use elsewhere in the codebase.


19-28: Effective caching strategy implementation

The cache setup with a 15-second freshness window and 30-second staleness window is a good balance between performance and data accuracy for incident monitoring.


33-87: Well-implemented client with robust error handling

The BetterStackClient implementation is thorough and robust:

  • Checks for required environment variables
  • Uses SWR caching pattern
  • Implements retry logic with exponential backoff
  • Handles and logs errors properly
  • Returns well-structured responses

This implementation will gracefully handle API issues while maintaining a good user experience.


1-88: Consider unit tests for this service

This service is critical for displaying incident information to users. Consider adding unit tests to verify:

  • Error handling when environment variables are missing
  • Proper parsing of API responses
  • Cache behavior and expiration
  • Retry logic

Are there unit tests for this new service? If not, would you like me to suggest some test cases?

@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit ccc9764 into main May 9, 2025
12 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the active-incident-panel branch May 9, 2025 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants