Update self-hosting docs #1354
Update self-hosting docs #1354
Conversation
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration and updates documentation for self-hosting Trigger.dev. It adds a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
.github/workflows/pr_checks.yml (1)
6-7: Consider the implications of skipping all checks for documentation changesThe addition of
paths-ignorefor thedocs/**directory aligns with the PR objective of streamlining the review process for documentation updates. However, this change has some potential drawbacks:
- It skips all checks defined in this workflow for documentation changes, which might include important checks that should run regardless of the changed files (e.g., linting for markdown files).
- There's no mechanism to selectively run certain checks for documentation changes.
- This might lead to reduced quality assurance for documentation changes if important checks are skipped.
Consider the following alternatives or improvements:
- Instead of ignoring all checks, create a separate job for documentation-specific checks (e.g., markdown linting, link checking) that runs only for changes in the
docs/**directory.- Use GitHub Actions'
ifconditions in individual jobs to selectively run or skip checks based on the changed files.- Implement a matrix strategy to define which checks should run for different types of changes.
Example of selective job execution:
jobs: docs-check: if: ${{ contains(github.event.pull_request.files.*.path, 'docs/') }} runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Run markdown lint run: # Add your markdown linting command here other-checks: if: ${{ !contains(github.event.pull_request.files.*.path, 'docs/') }} # ... rest of your existing checksThis approach allows you to maintain quality checks for documentation while still optimizing the workflow for non-documentation changes.
docs/open-source-self-hosting.mdx (7)
6-7: Approved: Clear scope definition for the guideThis note effectively sets expectations for users by clarifying that the guide is specifically for Docker deployments. It's a valuable addition to prevent confusion.
Consider a minor grammatical improvement:
-<Note>This guide is for Docker only. We don't currently provide documentation for Kubernetes.</Note> +<Note>This guide is for Docker only. We currently don't provide documentation for Kubernetes.</Note>
14-17: Approved: Clear overview of setup optionsThis overview effectively introduces the two alternative setup options, providing users with a clear understanding of their choices.
There's a minor grammatical issue in the first sentence. Consider this correction:
-The self-hosting guide covers two alternative setups. The first options uses a simple setup where you run everything on one server. +The self-hosting guide covers two alternative setups. The first option uses a simple setup where you run everything on one server.🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[grammar] ~14-~14: Did you mean “options use” or “”?
Context: ...overs two alternative setups. The first options uses a simple setup where you run everything...(NNS_USES)
170-178: Approved: Improved registry setup instructionsThe updated instructions for logging into Docker Hub are more detailed and accurate. The addition of logging in the
docker-providercontainer is crucial for ensuring smooth deployments.For improved clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of why logging in the
docker-providercontainer is necessary. For example:4. Ensure the `docker-provider` container is logged in as well: + (This step is crucial for allowing the container to pull images during deployments)
234-287: Approved: Comprehensive coverage of additional featuresThe new Additional features section is a valuable addition to the documentation. It covers important topics such as handling large payloads, version locking, and authentication options. The explanations are clear and include helpful examples.
In the auth options subsection, consider adding a brief explanation of why GitHub OAuth is not recommended for self-hosted instances. This would provide users with more context for the warning. For example:
<Warning>Only enable GitHub auth if you understand the risks! We strongly advise you against this.</Warning> +GitHub OAuth for self-hosted instances can potentially allow any GitHub user to access your instance, which may pose security risks. Your GitHub OAuth app needs a callback URL `https://<your_domain>/auth/github/callback` and you will have to set the following env vars:🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~261-~261: The preposition ‘to’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ell. By default, the images will point at the latest versioned release via the `v...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_AT_TO)
[style] ~278-~278: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...d_ for self-hosted instances. It's also very easy to lock yourself out of your own instan...(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
Line range hint
289-301: Suggestion: Retain original section name and clarify checkpoint storageThe renaming of this section to "Troubleshooting" seems inconsistent with its content, which primarily focuses on checkpoint support. Consider keeping the original "Checkpoint support" title for clarity.
The added information about where checkpoints will be pushed is valuable. It helps users understand the storage mechanism for checkpoints.
Consider the following changes:
- Revert the section title to "Checkpoint support"
- Add a separate "Troubleshooting" section if needed for other issues
- Consider adding a brief explanation of why checkpoints are pushed to the registry, e.g., for consistency and ease of management
The added information about checkpoint storage is helpful and approved.
🧰 Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~308-~308: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... containers #### Setup Underneath the hood this uses Checkpoint and Restore in Use...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~308-~308: The preposition ‘for’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...s://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu) in short. We'll have to do a few things to...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_IN_FOR)
409-430: Approved: Helpful troubleshooting section addedThe new Troubleshooting section is a valuable addition to the documentation. It addresses common issues that users might encounter, such as deployment failures and production run failures, providing clear and actionable solutions.
To improve clarity, consider adding brief explanations for why these issues might occur. For example:
- **Deployment fails at the push step.** The machine running `deploy` needs registry access: + **Deployment fails at the push step.** This often occurs when the machine running `deploy` lacks proper registry access. To resolve: - **Prod runs fail to start.** The `docker-provider` needs registry access: + **Prod runs fail to start.** This typically happens when the `docker-provider` container doesn't have the necessary registry access. To fix:
Line range hint
433-522: Approved: Comprehensive CLI usage guide for self-hosted instancesThe new CLI usage section is an excellent addition to the documentation. It covers important topics such as login, custom profiles, deployment, and CI/GitHub Actions usage, providing clear explanations and helpful examples for users working with self-hosted instances.
To make the section even more comprehensive, consider adding a brief subsection about troubleshooting common CLI issues in a self-hosted environment. This could include tips on debugging connection problems or authentication issues specific to self-hosted setups.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/pr_checks.yml (1 hunks)
- docs/open-source-self-hosting.mdx (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/open-source-self-hosting.mdx
[grammar] ~14-~14: Did you mean “options use” or “”?
Context: ...overs two alternative setups. The first options uses a simple setup where you run everything...(NNS_USES)
[uncategorized] ~261-~261: The preposition ‘to’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ell. By default, the images will point at the latest versioned release via the `v...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_AT_TO)
[style] ~278-~278: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...d_ for self-hosted instances. It's also very easy to lock yourself out of your own instan...(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
docs/open-source-self-hosting.mdx (1)
18-21: Approved: Helpful support information addedThe new Support section is a great addition. It provides users with a clear path to get assistance by joining the self-hosting channel on Discord. The playful reference adds a friendly touch to the documentation.
Adds a support and troubleshooting section. Documents auth and large payloads with the respective env vars. Also disables irrelevant PR checks when only making changes to docs.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
docker-providercontainer.Documentation