APT source whitelist request for llvm-toolchain-precise-3.9

[nikkikom]

deb http://apt.llvm.org/precise/ llvm-toolchain-precise-3.9 main
deb-src http://apt.llvm.org/precise/ llvm-toolchain-precise-3.9 main

[palmer-dabbelt]

I believe this GPG key is needed http://llvm.org/apt/llvm-snapshot.gpg.key. At least, that's what the 3.8 version looks like: https://github.com/travis-ci/apt-source-whitelist/blob/master/ubuntu.json#L187.

[cocreature]

Can we please get this whitelisted? LLVM 3.9 is supposed to be out next week so now is the time to test things to catch any lastminute bugs.

[cocreature]

LLVM-3.9 is now released, any way to accelerate getting this whitelisted?

[offa]

As a workaround until 3.9 becomes available:

      addons:
        apt:
          packages:
            - clang-3.9
            - libc++-dev
          sources: &sources
            - ubuntu-toolchain-r-test
            - llvm-toolchain-precise
            - sourceline: 'deb http://apt.llvm.org/trusty/ llvm-toolchain-trusty-3.9 main'
              key_url: 'http://apt.llvm.org/llvm-snapshot.gpg.key'

[emilio]

Hi, any news on this?

Thanks!

[tmcdonell]

bump

[tmcdonell]

Also can we please get this in both the precise and trusty whitelists, now that those have been separated?

[onqtam]

bump

[pmalek]

@offa I tried this workaround in my sources but unfortunately I get

Disallowing sources: \{:key_url\=\>"http://llvm.org/apt/llvm-snapshot.gpg.key",\ :sourceline\=\>"deb\ http://llvm.org/apt/precise/\ llvm-toolchain-precise-3.9\ main"\}

Travis build link

[offa]

My builds are running on trusty mostly, sudo enabled - maybe that's the issue.

Can you check again with these lines?

dist: trusty
sudo: required

[…]

[pmalek]

@offa Hmm I believe that should work but this will considerably lengthen my build time as mentioned on travis doc 1-6s vs 20-52s.

By this I believe we came back to the original topic :)

[offa]

Unfortunately that's the best, working and simplest workaround I know at the moment. Looking forward to see 3.9 whitelisted.

[giordi91]

any news on this?

[zimmski]

@BanzaiMan is it possible that this issue can be closed because of ebc2789 ?

[BanzaiMan]

Indeed.