Skip to content

Use exact matching for IN clause with ignore case #4412

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

Prior to this change the generated pattern would have matched more entries than it should have. The behavior is now aligned to its counterpart not using the IgnoreCase flag.

Resolves: #4404

Prior to this change the generated pattern would have matched more entries than it should have. The behavior is now aligned to its counterpart not using the IgnoreCase flag.
Mark method potentially returning null as such and remove unused imports.
@mp911de mp911de changed the title Use exact matching for IN clause with ignore case. Use exact matching for IN clause with ignore case Jun 14, 2023
@mp911de mp911de added the type: bug A general bug label Jun 14, 2023
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.4.13 (2021.2.13) milestone Jun 14, 2023
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Prior to this change the generated pattern would have matched more entries than it should have. The behavior is now aligned to its counterpart not using the IgnoreCase flag.

Closes #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Mark method potentially returning null as such and remove unused imports.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Use extended switch syntax.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Prior to this change the generated pattern would have matched more entries than it should have. The behavior is now aligned to its counterpart not using the IgnoreCase flag.

Closes #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Mark method potentially returning null as such and remove unused imports.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Use extended switch syntax.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Prior to this change the generated pattern would have matched more entries than it should have. The behavior is now aligned to its counterpart not using the IgnoreCase flag.

Closes #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Mark method potentially returning null as such and remove unused imports.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Use extended switch syntax.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Prior to this change the generated pattern would have matched more entries than it should have. The behavior is now aligned to its counterpart not using the IgnoreCase flag.

Closes #4404
Original pull request: #4412
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2023
Mark method potentially returning null as such and remove unused imports.

See #4404
Original pull request: #4412
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jun 14, 2023

That's merged and backported now.

@mp911de mp911de closed this Jun 14, 2023
@mp911de mp911de deleted the issue/4404 branch June 14, 2023 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

InIgnoreCase queries match on substrings
2 participants