Skip to content

Add missing type annotations that do not break binary compatibility #657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023
Merged

Add missing type annotations that do not break binary compatibility #657

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023

Conversation

dubinsky
Copy link
Contributor

Some missing type annotations can be added without breaking binary compatibility; they are added in this pull request, letting #655 concentrate on adding type annotations that do break binary compatibility (for Scala 3).

Removed MiMa exclusions that are no longer needed.

Removed Gitter link to a non-existing room.

Added links to the compiler implementation of the SymbolicXMLBuilder for different versions of Scala.

Some missing type annotations can be added without breaking binary compatibility; they are added in this pull request, letting #655 concentrate on adding type annotations that _do_ break binary compatibility (for Scala 3).

Removed MiMa exclusions that are no longer needed.

Removed Gitter link to a non-existing room.

Added links to the compiler implementation of the `SymbolicXMLBuilder` for different versions of Scala.
@dubinsky dubinsky marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2023 19:05
@dubinsky dubinsky requested a review from SethTisue March 28, 2023 19:05
Copy link
Member

@SethTisue SethTisue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice

@dubinsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

nice

thanks!

@dubinsky dubinsky merged commit ed329cc into scala:main Mar 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants