Skip to content

implement rfc-2528 type_changing-struct-update #90035

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/error.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ pub enum TypeError<'tcx> {
TupleSize(ExpectedFound<usize>),
FixedArraySize(ExpectedFound<u64>),
ArgCount,
FieldMisMatch(Symbol, Symbol),

RegionsDoesNotOutlive(Region<'tcx>, Region<'tcx>),
RegionsInsufficientlyPolymorphic(BoundRegionKind, Region<'tcx>),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for TypeError<'tcx> {
pluralize!(values.found)
),
ArgCount => write!(f, "incorrect number of function parameters"),
FieldMisMatch(adt, field) => write!(f, "field type mismatch: {}.{}", adt, field),
RegionsDoesNotOutlive(..) => write!(f, "lifetime mismatch"),
RegionsInsufficientlyPolymorphic(br, _) => write!(
f,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -224,6 +226,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeError<'tcx> {
| ArgumentMutability(_)
| TupleSize(_)
| ArgCount
| FieldMisMatch(..)
| RegionsDoesNotOutlive(..)
| RegionsInsufficientlyPolymorphic(..)
| RegionsOverlyPolymorphic(..)
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/structural_impls.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Lift<'tcx> for ty::error::TypeError<'a> {
TupleSize(x) => TupleSize(x),
FixedArraySize(x) => FixedArraySize(x),
ArgCount => ArgCount,
FieldMisMatch(x, y) => FieldMisMatch(x, y),
RegionsDoesNotOutlive(a, b) => {
return tcx.lift((a, b)).map(|(a, b)| RegionsDoesNotOutlive(a, b));
}
Expand Down
175 changes: 136 additions & 39 deletions compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,12 +33,15 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_hir::{ExprKind, QPath};
use rustc_infer::infer;
use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKind};
use rustc_infer::infer::InferOk;
use rustc_middle::ty;
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::{Adjust, Adjustment, AllowTwoPhase};
use rustc_middle::ty::error::TypeError::FieldMisMatch;
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
use rustc_middle::ty::TypeFoldable;
use rustc_middle::ty::{AdtKind, Visibility};
use rustc_session::parse::feature_err;
use rustc_span::edition::LATEST_STABLE_EDITION;
use rustc_span::hygiene::DesugaringKind;
use rustc_span::lev_distance::find_best_match_for_name;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1262,49 +1265,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
.emit_err(StructExprNonExhaustive { span: expr.span, what: adt.variant_descr() });
}

let error_happened = self.check_expr_struct_fields(
self.check_expr_struct_fields(
adt_ty,
expected,
expr.hir_id,
qpath.span(),
variant,
fields,
base_expr.is_none(),
base_expr,
expr.span,
);
if let Some(base_expr) = base_expr {
// If check_expr_struct_fields hit an error, do not attempt to populate
// the fields with the base_expr. This could cause us to hit errors later
// when certain fields are assumed to exist that in fact do not.
if !error_happened {
self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(base_expr, adt_ty, |_| {});
match adt_ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(adt, substs) if adt.is_struct() => {
let fru_field_types = adt
.non_enum_variant()
.fields
.iter()
.map(|f| {
self.normalize_associated_types_in(
expr.span,
f.ty(self.tcx, substs),
)
})
.collect();

self.typeck_results
.borrow_mut()
.fru_field_types_mut()
.insert(expr.hir_id, fru_field_types);
}
_ => {
self.tcx
.sess
.emit_err(FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span });
}
}
}
}
self.require_type_is_sized(adt_ty, expr.span, traits::StructInitializerSized);
adt_ty
}
Expand All @@ -1317,9 +1288,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
span: Span,
variant: &'tcx ty::VariantDef,
ast_fields: &'tcx [hir::ExprField<'tcx>],
check_completeness: bool,
base_expr: &'tcx Option<&'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>>,
expr_span: Span,
) -> bool {
) {
let tcx = self.tcx;

let adt_ty_hint = self
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1394,7 +1365,135 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
)
.emit();
}
} else if check_completeness && !error_happened && !remaining_fields.is_empty() {
}

// If check_expr_struct_fields hit an error, do not attempt to populate
// the fields with the base_expr. This could cause us to hit errors later
// when certain fields are assumed to exist that in fact do not.
if error_happened {
return;
}

if let Some(base_expr) = base_expr {
let expected = if self.tcx.features().type_changing_struct_update {
NoExpectation
} else {
ExpectHasType(adt_ty)
};
let mut ty = self.check_expr_with_expectation(base_expr, expected);

let expected_ty = expected.to_option(&self).unwrap_or(adt_ty);
// While we don't allow *arbitrary* coercions here, we *do* allow
// coercions from ! to `expected`.
if ty.is_never() {
assert!(
!self.typeck_results.borrow().adjustments().contains_key(base_expr.hir_id),
"expression with never type wound up being adjusted"
);
let adj_ty = self.next_ty_var(TypeVariableOrigin {
kind: TypeVariableOriginKind::AdjustmentType,
span: base_expr.span,
});
self.apply_adjustments(
base_expr,
vec![Adjustment { kind: Adjust::NeverToAny, target: adj_ty }],
);
ty = adj_ty;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, what is this needed for? If this is needed, can you add a test for it?

let cause = self.misc(base_expr.span);
let mut fru_tys = None;
let mut err = None;
let is_struct;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why define this here?


if let ty::Adt(adt, substs) = expected_ty.kind() {
match ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(base_adt, base_subs) if adt == base_adt => {
if self.tcx.features().type_changing_struct_update {
let tys = variant
.fields
.iter()
.map(|f| {
let fru_ty = self.normalize_associated_types_in(
expr_span,
self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, base_subs),
);
let ident = self.tcx.adjust_ident(f.ident, variant.def_id);
if let Some(_) = remaining_fields.remove(&ident) {
let target_ty = self.field_ty(base_expr.span, f, substs);
match self.at(&cause, self.param_env).sup(target_ty, fru_ty)
{
Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: () }) => {
self.register_predicates(obligations)
}
// FIXME: Need better diagnostics for `FieldMisMatch` error
Err(_) => {
if err.is_none() {
err = Some(self.report_mismatched_types(
&cause,
target_ty,
fru_ty,
FieldMisMatch(
variant.ident.name,
ident.name,
),
))
}
}
}
}
fru_ty
})
.collect();
fru_tys = Some(tys);
} else {
err = self.demand_suptype_diag(base_expr.span, expected_ty, ty);
if err.is_some() && self.tcx.sess.is_nightly_build() {
feature_err(
&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess,
sym::type_changing_struct_update,
base_expr.span,
"type changing struct updating is experimental",
)
.emit();
}
}
}
_ => {
err = self.demand_suptype_diag(base_expr.span, expected_ty, ty);
}
}
is_struct = adt.is_struct();
if is_struct && fru_tys.is_none() {
fru_tys = Some(
variant
.fields
.iter()
.map(|f| {
self.normalize_associated_types_in(
expr_span,
f.ty(self.tcx, substs),
)
})
.collect(),
)
}
} else {
err = self.demand_suptype_diag(base_expr.span, expected_ty, ty);
is_struct = false;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just emit the error here?

Or, better yet, any way we can just return early and do away with the nesting?

}
if let Some(mut err) = err {
let expr = base_expr.peel_drop_temps();
self.suggest_deref_ref_or_into(&mut err, expr, expected_ty, ty, None);
err.emit();
}
if let Some(fru_tys) = fru_tys {
self.typeck_results.borrow_mut().fru_field_types_mut().insert(expr_id, fru_tys);
}
if !is_struct {
let e = FunctionalRecordUpdateOnNonStruct { span: base_expr.span };
self.tcx.sess.emit_err(e);
}
} else if kind_name != "union" && !remaining_fields.is_empty() {
let inaccessible_remaining_fields = remaining_fields.iter().any(|(_, (_, field))| {
!field.vis.is_accessible_from(tcx.parent_module(expr_id).to_def_id(), tcx)
});
Expand All @@ -1405,8 +1504,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
self.report_missing_fields(adt_ty, span, remaining_fields);
}
}

error_happened
}

fn check_struct_fields_on_error(
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# `type_changing_struct_update`

The tracking issue for this feature is: [#86555]

[#86555]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86555

------------------------

This implements [RFC2528]. When turned on, you can create instances of the same struct
that have different generic type or lifetime parameters.

[RFC2528]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2528-type-changing-struct-update-syntax.md

```rust
#![allow(unused_variables, dead_code)]
#![feature(type_changing_struct_update)]

fn main () {
struct Foo<T, U> {
field1: T,
field2: U,
}

let base: Foo<String, i32> = Foo {
field1: String::from("hello"),
field2: 1234,
};
let updated: Foo<f64, i32> = Foo {
field1: 3.14,
..base
};
}
```

This file was deleted.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
// gate-test-type_changing_struct_update

#[derive(Debug)]
struct Machine<S> {
state: S,
Expand All @@ -17,9 +19,10 @@ fn update_to_state2() {
};
let m2: Machine<State2> = Machine {
state: State2,
..m1 //~ ERROR mismatched types
..m1
//~^ ERROR type changing struct updating is experimental [E0658]
//~| ERROR mismatched types [E0308]
};
// FIXME: this should trigger feature gate
assert_eq!(State2, m2.state);
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
error[E0658]: type changing struct updating is experimental
--> $DIR/feature-gate.rs:22:11
|
LL | ..m1
| ^^
|
= note: see issue #86555 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86555> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(type_changing_struct_update)]` to the crate attributes to enable

error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/feature-gate.rs:22:11
|
LL | ..m1
| ^^ expected struct `State2`, found struct `State1`
|
= note: expected struct `Machine<State2>`
found struct `Machine<State1>`

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0308, E0658.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
#![feature(type_changing_struct_update)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]

#[derive(Clone)]
struct Machine<'a, S> {
state: S,
lt_str: &'a str,
common_field: i32,
}

#[derive(Clone)]
struct State1;
#[derive(Clone)]
struct State2;

fn update_to_state2() {
let s = String::from("hello");
let m1: Machine<State1> = Machine {
state: State1,
lt_str: &s,
//~^ ERROR `s` does not live long enough [E0597]
// FIXME: The error here actually comes from line 34. The
// span of the error message should be corrected to line 34
common_field: 2,
};
// update lifetime
let m3: Machine<'static, State1> = Machine {
lt_str: "hello, too",
..m1.clone()
};
// update lifetime and type
let m4: Machine<'static, State2> = Machine {
state: State2,
lt_str: "hello, again",
..m1.clone()
};
// updating to `static should fail.
let m2: Machine<'static, State1> = Machine {
..m1
};
}

fn main() {}
Loading