Skip to content

Code cleanup. #39714

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2017
Merged

Code cleanup. #39714

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2017

Conversation

vadimcn
Copy link
Contributor

@vadimcn vadimcn commented Feb 10, 2017

r? @michaelwoerister

Just figured out that the same condition may be expressed much more cleanly.
Sorry for the churn!

@vadimcn
Copy link
Contributor Author

vadimcn commented Feb 22, 2017

@michaelwoerister, ping!

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Sorry for the wait, I'm not really available until the second week of March.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 23, 2017

📌 Commit 2889675 has been approved by michaelwoerister

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 24, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 2889675 with merge fd08d3f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 24, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

alexcrichton commented Feb 24, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 24, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 2889675 with merge 9f082d2...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2017
Code cleanup.

r? @michaelwoerister

Just figured out that the same condition may be expressed much more cleanly.
Sorry for the churn!
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 24, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: michaelwoerister
Pushing 9f082d2 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 2889675 into rust-lang:master Feb 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants