Skip to content

doc: that line was too long #33142

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2016
Merged

doc: that line was too long #33142

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2016

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

/// the lock is left unspecified, however, this function will not return on
/// the second call, it might e.g. panic or deadlock.
/// the lock is left unspecified. However, this function will not return on
/// the second call. It might panic or deadlock, for example.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the first interruption, I agree. However, the second makes the sentence less comfortable to read.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GuillaumeGomez Maybe I put the last sentence in brackets?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure to see what you propose. So do it and we'll see. :)

Copy link
Member Author

@tshepang tshepang Apr 22, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

However, this function will not return on the second call (it might panic or deadlock, for example).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh great! I approve this one.

@tshepang
Copy link
Member Author

@GuillaumeGomez done

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

r=me @steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r=guillaumegomez

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 26, 2016

📌 Commit 7609c64 has been approved by guillaumegomez

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 26, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 7609c64 with merge 01a0207...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 7609c64 into rust-lang:master Apr 26, 2016
@tshepang tshepang deleted the split-long-line branch April 26, 2016 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants