Skip to content

Make lexer tooling message more generic #28603

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2015

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

We don't actually probe for javac in all circumstances, so if you have
javac installed, but don't have antlr4 installed, and you're on Mac OS
X, then you'll get a message that javac is missing, even though that's
wrong.

To fix this, let's just be a bit more generic in the message, so that
it's the same no matter what part of the lexer tests you're missing.

cc
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3m199d/running_make_check_on_the_source_code_says_javac/

We don't actually probe for javac in all circumstances, so if you have
javac installed, but don't have antlr4 installed, and you're on Mac OS
X, then you'll get a message that javac is missing, even though that's
wrong.

To fix this, let's just be a bit more generic in the message, so that
it's the same no matter what part of the lexer tests you're missing.

cc
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3m199d/running_make_check_on_the_source_code_says_javac/
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ f781154

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2015
We don't actually probe for javac in all circumstances, so if you have
javac installed, but don't have antlr4 installed, and you're on Mac OS
X, then you'll get a message that javac is missing, even though that's
wrong.

To fix this, let's just be a bit more generic in the message, so that
it's the same no matter what part of the lexer tests you're missing.

cc
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3m199d/running_make_check_on_the_source_code_says_javac/
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 23, 2015

⌛ Testing commit f781154 with merge edeb4f1...

@bors bors merged commit f781154 into rust-lang:master Sep 23, 2015
@lifthrasiir
Copy link
Contributor

@steveklabnik ❤️

@steveklabnik steveklabnik deleted the small_config_fix branch June 19, 2016 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants