Skip to content

Add another case where cindent is correct #13600

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2014
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions src/etc/vim/indent/rust.vim
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ function GetRustIndent(lnum)
if prevline[len(prevline) - 1] == ","
\ && s:get_line_trimmed(a:lnum) !~ "^\\s*[\\[\\]{}]"
\ && prevline !~ "^\\s*fn\\s"
\ && prevline !~ "\\([^\\(\\)]\+,$"
" Oh ho! The previous line ended in a comma! I bet cindent will try to
" take this too far... For now, let's normally use the previous line's
" indent.
Expand All @@ -119,6 +120,16 @@ function GetRustIndent(lnum)
" fn foo(baz: Baz,
" baz: Baz) // <-- cindent gets this right by itself
"
" Another case is similar to the previous, except calling a function
" instead of defining it, or any conditional expression that leaves
" an open paren:
"
" foo(baz,
" baz);
"
" if baz && (foo ||
" bar) {
"
" There are probably other cases where we don't want to do this as
" well. Add them as needed.
return GetRustIndent(a:lnum - 1)
Expand Down