-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Loop constructs without parens #728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
the only tricky thing is that 'each' would no longer be a valid typename, I think |
yeah. 'for' and 'for each' are, I hope, going to unify into 'for'-that-means-iterator-call. that is, we'll make for mean what for each means now, and remove the linear-for-loop specialization. |
This has been implemented as part of the recent syntax overhaul. |
keeperofdakeys
pushed a commit
to keeperofdakeys/rust
that referenced
this issue
Dec 12, 2017
Openbsd kqueue The PR supersede rust-lang#613 to add exception on the testsuite.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Now that we have if and alts without parens I find myself wanting to write loops without them as well. Is this possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: