Skip to content

Typechecking if apparently doesn't require a boolean. #513

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
eholk opened this issue Jun 17, 2011 · 0 comments
Closed

Typechecking if apparently doesn't require a boolean. #513

eholk opened this issue Jun 17, 2011 · 0 comments
Assignees
@brson
Labels
A-type-system Area: Type system
Milestone
0.1 first support...

Comments

@eholk
Copy link
Contributor

eholk commented Jun 17, 2011

I accidentally wrote if(path_is_absolute) instead of if(path_is_absolute(p)) and got an LLVM assertion error instead of a rust type error. This doesn't seem right to me.
@ghost ghost assigned brson Jun 17, 2011
@brson brson closed this as completed in e8228e1 Jun 17, 2011
keeperofdakeys pushed a commit to keeperofdakeys/rust that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#513 - alexcrichton:fix, r=alexcrichton
5e16e98 
Fix the i686-unknown-linux-musl target CI
pdietl pushed a commit to pdietl/rust that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2020
@Centril
Merge pull request rust-lang#513 from l4l/fix/macro_frag_spec
78be683 
Add missed literal at MacroFragSpec
ZuseZ4 pushed a commit to EnzymeAD/rust that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2023
@tgymnich
Stop using CMake namespaces due to an inconsistency between macOS and…
9dfc76c 
… Linux (rust-lang#513)
celinval pushed a commit to celinval/rust-dev that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2024
@adpaco-aws @tedinski
Extend dashboard documentation (rust-lang#513)
82dea8a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@brson brson

Labels
A-type-system Area: Type system
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.1 first supported public release
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@eholk @brson