Skip to content

Don't trigger const_is_empty for inline const assertions #13558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

alex-semenyuk
Copy link
Member

@alex-semenyuk alex-semenyuk commented Oct 17, 2024

Close #13106

Considered case was described here

changelog: [const_is_empty]: skip const_is_empty for inline const assertions

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 17, 2024

r? @dswij

rustbot has assigned @dswij.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 17, 2024
@dswij
Copy link
Member

dswij commented Oct 20, 2024

Thank you! @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 20, 2024

📌 Commit 8555922 has been approved by dswij

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 20, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8555922 with merge 9faad60...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2024
Don't trigger `const_is_empty` for inline const assertions

Close #13106

Considered case was described [here](#13114 (comment))

changelog [`const_is_empty`]: skip const_is_empty for inline const assertions
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 20, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@alex-semenyuk
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 22, 2024

@alex-semenyuk: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

@dswij
Copy link
Member

dswij commented Oct 22, 2024

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 22, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8555922 with merge 69c4e86...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
Don't trigger `const_is_empty` for inline const assertions

Close #13106

Considered case was described [here](#13114 (comment))

changelog [`const_is_empty`]: skip const_is_empty for inline const assertions
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 22, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@alex-semenyuk
Copy link
Member Author

@dswij need one more attempt or is it something with the PR

@y21
Copy link
Member

y21 commented Oct 24, 2024

The PR description needs to contain exactly changelog:. The colon is missing there.

@alex-semenyuk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for pointing. Now should be ok.

@y21
Copy link
Member

y21 commented Oct 24, 2024

@bors r=dswij

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2024

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

  • This pull request previously failed. You should add more commits to fix the bug, or use retry to trigger a build again.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2024

📌 Commit 8555922 has been approved by dswij

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 8555922 with merge 6bcd0b9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: dswij
Pushing 6bcd0b9 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 6bcd0b9 into rust-lang:master Oct 24, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

const_is_empty emits for inline const assertions
5 participants