fix(rustc): Don't panic on unknown bins #15497
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This takes the most surgical, direct route to addressing the problem. Alternatively, we could look into why `cargo rustc` and `cargo check` are different. Fixes rust-lang#15493
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
rustbot
added
A-cargo-targets
weihanglo
approved these changes
May 6, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want to beta-backport this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unsure because we have limited time to vet it before release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it is the only concern, then should be fine. I can do the backport.
And I don't think the backport will cause other regressions.
weihanglo
added a commit
to weihanglo/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
### What does this PR try to resolve? Fixes rust-lang#15493 ### How should we test and review this PR? This takes the most surgical, direct route to addressing the problem. Alternatively, we could look into why `cargo rustc` and `cargo check` are different. ### Additional information
epage
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
Beta backports * #15497 In order to make CI pass, the following PRs are also cherry-picked: *
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2025
Update cargo 25 commits in 7918c7eb59614c39f1c4e27e99d557720976bdd7..056f5f4f3c100cb36b5e9aed2d20b9ea70aae295 2025-04-27 09:44:23 +0000 to 2025-05-09 14:54:18 +0000 - Revert "doc: Mention `XDG_DATA_HOME`" (rust-lang/cargo#15512) - docs: update version notice for deprecation removal (rust-lang/cargo#15511) - doc: Update instructions on using native-completions (rust-lang/cargo#15480) - feat(network): use Retry-After header for HTTP 429 responses (rust-lang/cargo#15463) - CI: Require schema job to pass (rust-lang/cargo#15504) - chore(config): migrate renovate config (rust-lang/cargo#15501) - Make cargo script ignore workspaces (rust-lang/cargo#15496) - fix(rustc): Don't panic on unknown bins (rust-lang/cargo#15497) - test: Remove unused nightly requirements (rust-lang/cargo#15498) - Add support for `-Zembed-metadata` (rust-lang/cargo#15378) - Fix tracking issue template link (rust-lang/cargo#15494) - Refactor artifact deps in FeatureResolver::deps (rust-lang/cargo#15492) - Improved error message for versions prefixed with `v` (rust-lang/cargo#15484) - chore: fix some typos in comment (rust-lang/cargo#15485) - fix: default to all targets when using `--edition` and ` --edition-idioms` in cargo fix (rust-lang/cargo#15192) - Update fingerprint footnote (rust-lang/cargo#15478) - feat(add): suggest similarly named features (rust-lang/cargo#15438) - In package-workspace, keep dev-dependencies if they have a version (rust-lang/cargo#15470) - docs: fix a typo in DependencyUI (rust-lang/cargo#15472) - fix grammar, and remove confusing example (rust-lang/cargo#15457) - Added tracing spans for rustc invocations (rust-lang/cargo#15464) - Trivial tweaks to 'target_short_hash' (rust-lang/cargo#15461) - chore(deps): update msrv (3 versions) to v1.84 (rust-lang/cargo#15456) - feat(add/install): check if given crate argument would be valid with inserted @ symbol (rust-lang/cargo#15441) - chang 1 tries to 1 try (rust-lang/cargo#15328) r? ghost
weihanglo
added a commit
to weihanglo/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2025
### What does this PR try to resolve? Fixes rust-lang#15493 ### How should we test and review this PR? This takes the most surgical, direct route to addressing the problem. Alternatively, we could look into why `cargo rustc` and `cargo check` are different. ### Additional information
epage
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2025
Beta backports * #15497 In order to make CI pass, the following PRs are also cherry-picked: * --- This was my fault that missed the merge window…
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Fixes #15493
How should we test and review this PR?
This takes the most surgical, direct route to addressing the problem.
Alternatively, we could look into why
cargo rustcandcargo checkare different.
Additional information