-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 855
Update the triage/triaging.rst page. #914
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 5 commits
1b14292
e4f4a77
19db210
87c3027
e928c57
034b1a3
5bd2948
f530bca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -7,32 +7,24 @@ Triaging an Issue | |
This section of the devguide documents the :ref:`issue tracker <tracker>` for | ||
users and developers. | ||
|
||
Contributors with the Triager role on the issue tracker can triage issues | ||
directly without any assistance. | ||
|
||
|
||
Checklist for Triaging | ||
====================== | ||
|
||
* Read the issue comment(s). | ||
* Review and set classification fields | ||
- Title: should be concise with specifics which are helpful to someone | ||
scanning a list of issue titles. (Optional, if possible) Add a | ||
prefix at the start of the title to indicate the module, e.g. IDLE, | ||
doc, or async. | ||
- Type | ||
- Stage | ||
- Components: multiple items may be set | ||
- Versions: set if known, leave blank if unsure. Multiple items may be set. | ||
* Review and set process fields | ||
- Status | ||
- Superseder | ||
- Assignees | ||
- Nosy List | ||
- Priority | ||
- Keywords | ||
* (Optional) Leave a brief comment about the proposed next action needed. If | ||
there is a long message list, a summary can be very helpful. | ||
* Check that the title is concise with specifics which are helpful to | ||
someone scanning a list of issue titles. | ||
* For pull request, ensure that the corresponding issue is added before | ||
the title (``gh-NNNNN: ...``). | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* Read the initial message and the comments. | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* Set all the relevant :ref:`labels <gh-labels>`. | ||
* Where appropriate, you might set the "Assignees", "Reviewers", and | ||
"Projects" fields. | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* You might also leave a brief comment about the proposed next action needed. | ||
If there is a long message list, a summary can be very helpful. | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* Finally, you can set the :gh-label:`triaged` label (unless you want other triagers | ||
to take a look). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is so far the first and only documentation we have about the "triaged" label, so let me try to understand what it's for. The idea is that if a triager does not want other triagers to look at the issue, they put a triaged label? Why would a triager not want other triagers to look at the issue? Is it then offensive for another triager or core dev to change the labels on the issue (undermining a decision that another triager marked as 'final')? This sounds to me like the opposite of how we work. It's the equivalent of a label that a no-committer can put on a PR to say "this has been reviewed. I do not want other non-commiters to review it". We don't have this label. We have the "awaiting core review" label which indicates that a non-committer has reviewed, but it does not dis-invite further reviews from non-committers. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see now that if I hover over the label it says "The issue has been accepted as valid by a triager". Which is quite different from what is implied by this doc. I don't think validity is something we expect triagers to decide about (when I proposed a "valid" label I tried to be clear that it is to be used by subject matter experts, not triagers). If you think that this is for triagers to decide, then this doc should explain how a triager is supposed to make that decision. If you don't think that, then the tooltip on the "triaged" label needs to change to whatever it is that this label means. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't remember the exact timeline, but I wrote that sentence on Aug 6 and I might have added the label description on GitHub later after more discussions. However it seems there is still no clear consensus on how it should be used. Are you at the sprints? Perhaps it could be discussed there. Regarding this specific PR, it is mostly about updating the checklist, not documenting the label itself. I can remove or change the sentence, and possibly re-add/update it again in next iteration. I also have another incoming PR (#930) where I can document it more extensively. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What meaning did the Steering Council intend when they approved the new term? I agree with deferring the Triaged sentence to get on with the improved list. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See https://discuss.python.org/t/improve-communication-with-contributors-on-the-issue-tracker-and-prs-language-summit-follow-up/15812/30, in particular:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm online, but I don't feel able to contribute on this matter beyond commenting on whether I think the documentation is consistent and clear. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, the idea is that if a triager thinks there is nothing more a triager can do, they mark the issue so others don't need to re-read it.
That would be like any other disagreement. It could be done in an offensive way, but hopefully won't.
I'd word it as “This has been reviewed. Other non-commiters are free to re-review it, but I believe their time would be better spent elsewhere.” (I don't speak for the entire Steering Council here.) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does “for now, at least” mean that the triaged label will be removed by a bot after a certain amount of time? Or how else will it work long term?
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
Note: some of these fields can only be set/edited by core developers. | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. _helptriage: | ||
|
@@ -41,14 +33,13 @@ Helping Triage Issues | |
===================== | ||
|
||
Once you know your way around how Python's source files are | ||
structured and you are comfortable working with patches, a great way to | ||
structured and you are comfortable with the workflow, a great way to | ||
contribute is to help triage issues. Do realize, though, that experience | ||
working on Python is needed in order to effectively help triage. | ||
|
||
Around the clock, new issues are being opened on the :ref:`issue tracker | ||
<tracker>` and existing issues are being updated. Every issue needs to be | ||
triaged to make sure various things are in proper order. Even without special | ||
privileges you can help with this process. | ||
triaged to make sure various things are in proper order. | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
Classifying Reports | ||
------------------- | ||
|
@@ -62,44 +53,45 @@ For bugs, an issue needs to: | |
These are things you can help with once you have experience developing for | ||
Python: | ||
|
||
* try reproducing the bug: For instance, if a bug is not clearly explained | ||
enough for you to reproduce it then there is a good chance a core developer | ||
* Try reproducing the bug: for instance, if a bug is not explained clearly | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
enough for you to reproduce it, then there is a good chance a core developer | ||
won't be able to either. | ||
* see if the issue happens on a different Python version: It is always helpful | ||
* See if the issue happens on a different Python version: it is always helpful | ||
to know if a bug not only affects the in-development version of Python, but | ||
whether it also affects other versions in maintenance mode. | ||
* write a unit test: If the bug lacks a unit test that should end up in | ||
* Write a unit test: if the bug lacks a unit test that should end up in | ||
Python's test suite, having that written can be very helpful. | ||
|
||
This is all helpful as it allows triagers (i.e., | ||
:ref:`people with the Developer role on the issue tracker <triagers>`) to | ||
properly classify an issue so it can be handled by the right core developers in | ||
a timely fashion. | ||
This is all helpful as it allows members of the :ref:`triage team <triage-team>` | ||
to properly classify an issue so it can be handled by the right core developers | ||
in a timely fashion. | ||
|
||
Reviewing Patches | ||
----------------- | ||
Reviewing Pull Requests | ||
----------------------- | ||
|
||
If an issue has a pull request attached that has not been reviewed, you can help | ||
by making sure the patch: | ||
If an issue has a linked pull request that has not been reviewed, | ||
you can help by making sure the pull request: | ||
|
||
* follows the style guides | ||
* applies cleanly to an up-to-date clone | ||
* is a good solution to the problem it is trying to solve | ||
* follows the style guides | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* includes proper tests | ||
* includes proper documentation changes | ||
* submitter is listed in ``Misc/ACKS``, either already or the patch adds them | ||
* includes a :ref:`NEWS entry <news-entry>` (if needed) | ||
* includes the author in ``Misc/ACKS``, either already or the patch adds them | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* doesn't have conflicts with the ``main`` branch | ||
|
||
Doing all of this allows core developers and :ref:`triagers <triage-team>` | ||
to more quickly look for subtle issues that only people with extensive | ||
experience working on Python's code base will notice. | ||
|
||
Doing all of this allows core developers and :ref:`triagers` to more | ||
quickly look for subtle issues that only people with extensive experience | ||
working on Python's code base will notice. | ||
See also :ref:`committing`. | ||
|
||
Finding an Issue You Can Help With | ||
---------------------------------- | ||
|
||
If you want to help triage issues, you might also want to search for issues | ||
in modules which you have a working knowledge. Search for the name of a module | ||
in the issue tracker or use the `advanced search`_ query builder to search for | ||
specific kinds of issues (e.g. the "Windows" label if you are a Windows | ||
developer, "Extension Modules" if you are familiar with C, etc.). | ||
If you want to help with triaging, you might also want to search for issues | ||
in modules which you have a working knowledge. Search for the name of a | ||
ezio-melotti marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
module in the issue tracker, filter by label, or use the `advanced search`_ | ||
to find these issues. | ||
|
||
.. _advanced search: https://github.com/search/advanced |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.