Skip to content

gh-90867: test.support.wait_process() uses LONG_TIMEOUT #99071

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2022
Merged

gh-90867: test.support.wait_process() uses LONG_TIMEOUT #99071

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2022

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Nov 3, 2022

The test.support.wait_process() function now uses a timeout of LONG_TIMEOUT seconds by default, instead of SHORT_TIMEOUT. It doesn't matter if a Python buildbot is slower, it only matters that the process completes. The timeout should just be shorter than "forever".

The test.support.wait_process() function now uses a timeout of
LONG_TIMEOUT seconds by default, instead of SHORT_TIMEOUT.  It
doesn't matter if a Python buildbot is slower, it only matters that
the process completes. The timeout should just be shorter than
"forever".
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @vstinner for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @vstinner, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.11 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker f09da28768b77713566e932e912f107b6b57e8fd 3.11

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-99098 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Nov 4, 2022
vstinner added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
… (#99098)

The test.support.wait_process() function now uses a timeout of
LONG_TIMEOUT seconds by default, instead of SHORT_TIMEOUT.  It
doesn't matter if a Python buildbot is slower, it only matters that
the process completes. The timeout should just be shorter than
"forever".

(cherry picked from commit f09da28)
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
…ythonGH-99071) (pythonGH-99098)

The test.support.wait_process() function now uses a timeout of
LONG_TIMEOUT seconds by default, instead of SHORT_TIMEOUT.  It
doesn't matter if a Python buildbot is slower, it only matters that
the process completes. The timeout should just be shorter than
"forever".

(cherry picked from commit a9a8c87)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f09da28)
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2022
) (GH-99098)

The test.support.wait_process() function now uses a timeout of
LONG_TIMEOUT seconds by default, instead of SHORT_TIMEOUT.  It
doesn't matter if a Python buildbot is slower, it only matters that
the process completes. The timeout should just be shorter than
"forever".

(cherry picked from commit a9a8c87)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f09da28)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants