[2.7] bpo-31285: fix an assertion failure and a SystemError in warnings.warn_explicit (GH-3219) #3805
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Serhiy and I agreed on another solution (https://bugs.python.org/issue31285#msg303308), so i would open another PR, this time with a sensible branch name. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of #3219 , but actually also a backport of #3803 , which is a cleanup after #3219 .
Also, i removed the test that verifies that the assertion failure is no more, because in 2.7, the code assumes that the value returned by
splitlines()is a string, and uses it without asserting it is a string, in such a way that causing some error (for testing purposes) is not simple (at least i didn't find a simple way).ISTM that the first test is good enough to verify that the
splitlines()attribute is ignored, andPyUnicode_Splitlines()is used directly.https://bugs.python.org/issue31285