Skip to content

[3.6] bpo-31571: Remove duplicated info in Lexical Analysis documentation (GH-3691) #3754

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2017

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 25, 2017

  • Remove the second mention about the u prefix
  • Remove the second mention about numeric literals do not include a sign
    (cherry picked from commit 4a2d00c)

https://bugs.python.org/issue31571

…tion (pythonGH-3691)

- Remove the second mention about the `u` prefix
- Remove the second mention about numeric literals do not include a sign
(cherry picked from commit 4a2d00c)
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpkc and @Mariatta: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@Mariatta Mariatta merged commit 26b940f into python:3.6 Sep 25, 2017
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @Mariatta!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-4a2d00c-3.6 branch September 25, 2017 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants