Skip to content

update comment about LLVM bug relevant for --with-tail-call-interp performance #132297

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

h-vetinari
Copy link
Contributor

@h-vetinari h-vetinari commented Apr 9, 2025

While reading the release notes for 3.14, I followed some links and noticed that the bug affecting the performance numbers for --with-tail-call-interp was fixed in LLVM v20.1.1 (llvm/llvm-project@0412f70) resp. on main (llvm/llvm-project@dd21aac)

This to me seems to be trivial enough to not require an issue, but if preferred, I can open one of course.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--132297.org.readthedocs.build/

@python-cla-bot
Copy link

python-cla-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2025

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.

CLA signed

@h-vetinari
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC @Fidget-Spinner

@Fidget-Spinner
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@h-vetinari
Copy link
Contributor Author

h-vetinari commented Apr 9, 2025

Thanks for the quick review! I signed the CLA, probably the CI needs to be restarted? IIUC, this also needs a skip issue label.

@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner merged commit 67ded6a into python:main Apr 9, 2025
26 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRs Apr 9, 2025
@h-vetinari h-vetinari deleted the llvm_bug branch April 9, 2025 14:57
seehwan pushed a commit to seehwan/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants