Add “maybe you meant” in argparse `choices` argument

[NIKDISSV-Forever]

argparse guesses

Print the possible (nearest) value of the argument. If options are specified with the choices argument.

Pitch

argparse are end user oriented.
Such a message will make the program interface more user-friendly.

def main():
    arg_parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    arg_parser.add_argument('family', type=str.casefold, help='Font family', choices=get_all_family_names(FAMILY_FILES))
    args = arg_parser.parse_args(['S200Flora'])

---

Now outputs this:

error: argument family: invalid choice: 's200flora' (choose from 'a431', ..., 's200flor', ... 'wingdings 3')

I suggest making the output look like this:

error: argument family: invalid choice: 's200flora', maybe you meant 's200flor'? (choose from 'a431', ..., 's200flor', ... 'wingdings 3')

---

It doesn't have to look exactly like this. I'm not talking about the implementation, perhaps the assumptions should always be (if there are matches) in the presence of the choices argument, perhaps only in some certain conditions.
These questions are decided by those who will implement it, as they see fit.

Previous discussion

Add “maybe you meant” in argparse choices argument on discuss.python.org

Linked PRs

• gh-99749: Add closest choice if exists in Argparser if wrong choice picked #99773
• gh-99749: Suggest closest choice in argparser, if wrong choice is picked #99831
• GH-99749: Add optional feature to suggest correct names (ArgumentParser) #124456
• GH-99749: Add What's New entry for #124456 #125671

[sobolevn]

Do you want to work on this? :)

[NIKDISSV-Forever]

I don't mind working on it, I have an idea of ​​how argparse works, it's just that I'm not a professional in git and have never done pull requests.

While this is a really good idea, I'll start working on it today.

[savannahostrowski]

Now completed with #124456