-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
8357135: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Error creating or attaching to libjvmci after JDK-8356447 #25307
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@dougxc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 69 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Silently disabling the top level JIT seems like a bad default behaviour for customers. |
This does not disable the JIT, just suppresses a specific type of error (i.e., reserving virtual address space for the SVM heap) when trying to initialize libgraal at startup. Importantly, the error of badly specified libgraal options still causes a VM exit. What alternative solution would you prefer? One of the other 2 proposals in the PR description? Or something else? |
After this executes we have a running JVM without a working libgraal right? It might be rare in a user environment but it's very confusing behaviour for an end user. Might this not occur in a virtualized environment? I agree it would be very hard to make libgraal robust in the face of such a limited virtual address space so I think disabling the tests for libgraal would be easiest. Or both of those tests could probably just run with -Xint to avoid this completely. |
I've reverted to this solution - thanks for the suggestion. |
Tested locally with a build that includes libgraal. |
/label add hotspot-gc |
@dougxc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems reasonable to me.
Thanks for the reviews. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 1258af4.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
As of JDK-8356447, libgraal initialization happens during VM startup. If during this initialization, the libgraal heap cannot be created due to lack of virtual address space, the VM will exit with:
This causes problems for tests that limit the virtual address space with
ulimit -v
such asgc/arguments/TestUseCompressedOopsFlagsWithUlimit.java
andvmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/Allocate/alloc001/alloc001.java
.Since these tests were passing on libgraal prior to JDK-8356447, they obviously do not require JIT compilation. The simplest fix is to then use
-Xint
to disable the JIT.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25307/head:pull/25307
$ git checkout pull/25307
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25307
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25307/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25307
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25307
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25307.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment