Skip to content

8357165: test java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java fails intermittently #25292

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

liach
Copy link
Member

@liach liach commented May 18, 2025

The test was originally written with product builds in mind; it didn't consider the slowness of debug builds, thus causing tests to fail.

Also there was a bug in testWeakAgainstClassValue: the test need to flush the backing map in the class to have the weak value removed. It is fixed in this patch as well.

Testing: ClassValueTest repeated 10 times on windows-x64/linux-x64/macosx-aarch64/linux-aarch64 fastdebug.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Warning

 ⚠️ Found leading lowercase letter in issue title for 8357165: test java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java fails intermittently

Issue

  • JDK-8357165: test java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java fails intermittently (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25292/head:pull/25292
$ git checkout pull/25292

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25292
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25292/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25292

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25292

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25292.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 18, 2025

@liach This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8357165: test java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java fails intermittently

Reviewed-by: jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 18, 2025

@liach The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 18, 2025

Webrevs

@jaikiran
Copy link
Member

Hello Chen, in general for tests like these we don't use any explicit timeout value for waiting on certain condition. It's based on our past experiences in the CI and various other test runtime environments where no timeout value is a "right" timeout and can cause intermittent timeouts like here.

In this test, I think we should just switch to using await() and join() i.e. no specific timeouts. If there is any bug (either in the test or the product code) and the test doesn't complete, then the jtreg's timeout infrastructure will fail the test and at the same time has the necessary features to collect all necessary details to help debug those unexpected timeout failures.

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented May 21, 2025

I still wish to keep these explicit timeouts - they can be fiddled around for debugging when something stalls after a ClassValue change. In comparison, the argless variants are much harder to tweak and/or debug.

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The update to increase the timeout to 1 minute * timeout factor, looks good to me.

I'm not too familiar with the bug that's requiring the testWeakAgainstClassValue() method to be updated, but if that helps with the test failures then it seems reasonable to fix it.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 21, 2025
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented May 22, 2025

The failing tier 1 tests on GitHub are gc ones. Thanks for the reviews! I think we are good to go.

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented May 22, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 22, 2025

Going to push as commit 12efc1f.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 22, 2025

@liach Pushed as commit 12efc1f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants