Skip to content

tsconfig.json exclude LS support #3546

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 16, 2015
Merged

tsconfig.json exclude LS support #3546

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 16, 2015

Conversation

jramsay
Copy link
Member

@jramsay jramsay commented Jun 18, 2015

@CyrusNajmabadi, @vladima, @billti : CoreServicesShimHost and CoreServicesShimHostAdapter changes to support tsconfig.json exclude from the language service.

…rt TSConfig exclude from the language service
@@ -61,8 +61,12 @@ namespace ts {

/** Public interface of the the of a config service shim instance.*/
export interface CoreServicesShimHost extends Logger {
/** Returns a JSON-encoded value of the type: string[] */
readDirectory(rootDir: string, extension: string): string;
/** Returns a JSON-encoded value of the type: string[]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Start the comment on the line after the /**

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

👍

1 similar comment
@mhegazy
Copy link
Contributor

mhegazy commented Jul 15, 2015

👍

jramsay added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2015
tsconfig.json exclude LS support
CoreServicesShimHost and CoreServicesShimHostAdapter changes to support tsconfig.json exclude from the language service.
@jramsay jramsay merged commit 01244d6 into master Jul 16, 2015
@mhegazy mhegazy deleted the tsConfigExcludeLSSupport branch July 16, 2015 02:45
@microsoft microsoft locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants