Skip to content

Double check that passes correctly set their Modified status #231

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

serge-sans-paille
Copy link
Collaborator

The approach is simple: if a pass reports that it's not modifying a
Function/Module, compute a loose hash of that Function/Module and compare it
with the original one. If we report no change but there's a hash change, then we
have an error.

This approach misses a lot of change but it's not super intrusive and can
detect most of the simple mistakes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80916

The approach is simple: if a pass reports that it's not modifying a
Function/Module, compute a loose hash of that Function/Module and compare it
with the original one. If we report no change but there's a hash change, then we
have an error.

This approach misses a lot of change but it's not super intrusive and can
detect most of the simple mistakes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80916
@repo-lockdown
Copy link

repo-lockdown bot commented Jul 13, 2020

This repository does not accept pull requests. Please follow http://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html#how-to-submit-a-patch for contribution to LLVM.

@repo-lockdown repo-lockdown bot closed this Jul 13, 2020
@repo-lockdown repo-lockdown bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant