-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[PseudoProbe] Fix cleanup for pseudo probe after annotation #119660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
When using -sample-profile-remove-probe, pseudo probe desc should also be removed and dwarf discriminator for call instruction should be restored.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-pgo @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Haohai Wen (HaohaiWen) ChangesWhen using -sample-profile-remove-probe, pseudo probe desc should Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119660.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
index b2fa66f2a6d379..603beb3b883d7f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/SampleProfile.cpp
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ class SampleProfileLoader final : public SampleProfileLoaderBaseImpl<Function> {
void generateMDProfMetadata(Function &F);
bool rejectHighStalenessProfile(Module &M, ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI,
const SampleProfileMap &Profiles);
- void removePseudoProbeInsts(Module &M);
+ void removePseudoProbeInstsDiscriminator(Module &M);
/// Map from function name to Function *. Used to find the function from
/// the function name. If the function name contains suffix, additional
@@ -2138,13 +2138,25 @@ bool SampleProfileLoader::rejectHighStalenessProfile(
return false;
}
-void SampleProfileLoader::removePseudoProbeInsts(Module &M) {
+void SampleProfileLoader::removePseudoProbeInstsDiscriminator(Module &M) {
for (auto &F : M) {
std::vector<Instruction *> InstsToDel;
for (auto &BB : F) {
for (auto &I : BB) {
if (isa<PseudoProbeInst>(&I))
InstsToDel.push_back(&I);
+ else if (isa<CallBase>(&I))
+ if (const DILocation *DIL = I.getDebugLoc().get()) {
+ // Restore dwarf discriminator for call.
+ unsigned Discriminator = DIL->getDiscriminator();
+ if (DILocation::isPseudoProbeDiscriminator(Discriminator)) {
+ std::optional<uint32_t> DwarfDiscriminator =
+ PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractDwarfBaseDiscriminator(
+ Discriminator);
+ I.setDebugLoc(DIL->cloneWithDiscriminator(
+ DwarfDiscriminator ? *DwarfDiscriminator : 0));
+ }
+ }
}
}
for (auto *I : InstsToDel)
@@ -2224,8 +2236,12 @@ bool SampleProfileLoader::runOnModule(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager *AM,
notInlinedCallInfo)
updateProfileCallee(pair.first, pair.second.entryCount);
- if (RemoveProbeAfterProfileAnnotation && FunctionSamples::ProfileIsProbeBased)
- removePseudoProbeInsts(M);
+ if (RemoveProbeAfterProfileAnnotation &&
+ FunctionSamples::ProfileIsProbeBased) {
+ removePseudoProbeInstsDiscriminator(M);
+ if (auto *FuncInfo = M.getNamedMetadata(PseudoProbeDescMetadataName))
+ M.eraseNamedMetadata(FuncInfo);
+ }
return retval;
}
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/pseudo-probe-profile.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/pseudo-probe-profile.ll
index b52f93763d4926..66dbc49a1d210a 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/pseudo-probe-profile.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SampleProfile/pseudo-probe-profile.ll
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
; RUN: opt < %t -passes=sample-profile -sample-profile-file=%S/Inputs/pseudo-probe-profile.prof -sample-profile-remove-probe -S | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=REMOVE-PROBE
; REMOVE-PROBE-NOT: call void @llvm.pseudoprobe
+; REMOVE-PROBE-NOT: !llvm.pseudo_probe_desc
+; REMOVE-PROBE: !DILexicalBlockFile({{.*}}, discriminator: 0)
define dso_local i32 @foo(i32 %x, ptr %f) #0 !dbg !4 {
entry:
|
PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractDwarfBaseDiscriminator( | ||
Discriminator); | ||
I.setDebugLoc(DIL->cloneWithDiscriminator( | ||
DwarfDiscriminator ? *DwarfDiscriminator : 0)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is zero discriminator same effect as no discriminator in DILexicalBlockFile?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so, looks the encoding https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h#L2101 0 means all the components are empty.
The flag was used to avoid probe intrinsic hindering optimizations, so discriminator value etc wasn't important for that purpose. Curious what are you using this flag for? |
.llvm.pseudo_probe_desc and discriminator will create .pseudo_probe and .pseudo_probe_desc sections which would increase the binary size of second round sampling PGO build (about hundreds of MBs for large project). .pseudo_probe_desc would also expose function name in binary. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
unsigned Discriminator = DIL->getDiscriminator(); | ||
if (DILocation::isPseudoProbeDiscriminator(Discriminator)) { | ||
std::optional<uint32_t> DwarfDiscriminator = | ||
PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractDwarfBaseDiscriminator( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A friendly caveat: this is still not the original DwarfBaseDiscriminator, it's only keep 3 bits(#94506), though it can cover most of the cases(95%+), just not the exact same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I noticed it.
PseudoProbeDwarfDiscriminator::extractDwarfBaseDiscriminator( | ||
Discriminator); | ||
I.setDebugLoc(DIL->cloneWithDiscriminator( | ||
DwarfDiscriminator ? *DwarfDiscriminator : 0)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so, looks the encoding https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h#L2101 0 means all the components are empty.
When using -sample-profile-remove-probe, pseudo probe desc should
also be removed and dwarf discriminator for call instruction should
be restored.