Skip to content

release/19.x: [clang-format] Fix a regression in parsing switch in macro call (#114506) #114640

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

llvmbot
Copy link
Member

@llvmbot llvmbot commented Nov 2, 2024

Backport 6ca816f

Requested by: @owenca

@llvmbot llvmbot added this to the LLVM 19.X Release milestone Nov 2, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member Author

llvmbot commented Nov 2, 2024

@HazardyKnusperkeks What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member Author

llvmbot commented Nov 2, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format

Author: None (llvmbot)

Changes

Backport 6ca816f

Requested by: @owenca


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114640.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp (+6-2)
  • (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp (+7)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
index a5268e153bcc5b..bfb592ae074938 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -2086,7 +2086,8 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement(
     case tok::kw_switch:
       if (Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_Java)
         parseSwitch(/*IsExpr=*/true);
-      nextToken();
+      else
+        nextToken();
       break;
     case tok::kw_case:
       // Proto: there are no switch/case statements.
@@ -2637,7 +2638,10 @@ bool UnwrappedLineParser::parseParens(TokenType AmpAmpTokenType) {
         nextToken();
       break;
     case tok::kw_switch:
-      parseSwitch(/*IsExpr=*/true);
+      if (Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_Java)
+        parseSwitch(/*IsExpr=*/true);
+      else
+        nextToken();
       break;
     case tok::kw_requires: {
       auto RequiresToken = FormatTok;
diff --git a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
index 4acd900ff061f8..07999116ab0cf0 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnotatorTest.cpp
@@ -3412,6 +3412,13 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, TemplateInstantiation) {
   EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[18], tok::greater, TT_TemplateCloser);
 }
 
+TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, SwitchInMacroArgument) {
+  auto Tokens = annotate("FOOBAR(switch);\n"
+                         "void f() {}");
+  ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 12u) << Tokens;
+  EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[9], tok::l_brace, TT_FunctionLBrace);
+}
+
 } // namespace
 } // namespace format
 } // namespace clang

@tru tru force-pushed the issue114408 branch 2 times, most recently from 53f3ba0 to 7b6ee6e Compare November 15, 2024 08:19
@tru tru merged commit 7b6ee6e into llvm:release/19.x Nov 15, 2024
1 check was pending
Copy link

@owenca (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants