Skip to content

chore: update doc links, fix grammar, fix a commented out test #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2023

Conversation

cwaldren-ld
Copy link
Contributor

Some misc fixes I've made while reading over the whole repo.

  • updated doc link
  • some minor grammar
  • fixed up a commented-out test

@shortcut-integration
Copy link

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #187424: Make redis-go integration ready for release.

@cwaldren-ld cwaldren-ld marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2023 21:13
Copy link

@louis-launchdarkly louis-launchdarkly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems that there is a bunch of test failure for Go 1.19 with Cluster? Not sure is that related to the one test you uncommented.

@cwaldren-ld
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm.. I didn't change anything that would cause that. It must be that we cannot deterministically test something that we are currently asserting on. I'll investigate in another PR though.

Copy link

@louis-launchdarkly louis-launchdarkly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As described, the investigation will be in a separate PR.

@cwaldren-ld cwaldren-ld merged commit cf6244b into main Feb 9, 2023
@cwaldren-ld cwaldren-ld deleted the cw/sc-187424/update-docs branch February 9, 2023 02:05
@cwaldren-ld
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, it looks like the v8 version of go-redis didn't fully support Redis 7.0: redis/go-redis#2085
That's why the main branch CI passed but this one failed - the bump to v9 does work, and that wasn't part of this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants