CI: run main workflows also on starkware-development branch

[JulianGCalderon]

CI: run main workflows also on starkware-development branch

Updates the CI workflows so that main workflows are also executed on the starkware-development branch.

Note: The hyper_threading_benchmark workflow will be compared against main, and not against starkware-development.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[FrancoGiachetta]

Since this branch will eventually be synced with main, shouldn't the changelog workflow also be included?

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.299 s ±  0.057 s    [User: 25.521 s, System: 0.775 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.259 s … 26.339 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.321 s ±  0.077 s    [User: 25.595 s, System: 0.725 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.266 s … 26.375 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.591 s ±  0.006 s    [User: 25.609 s, System: 0.752 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.587 s … 14.595 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.600 s ±  0.004 s    [User: 25.599 s, System: 0.777 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.597 s … 14.603 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.575 s ±  0.425 s    [User: 37.514 s, System: 0.924 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.275 s … 10.876 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.893 s ±  0.104 s    [User: 37.587 s, System: 0.939 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.820 s … 10.967 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.03 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.408 s ±  0.003 s    [User: 38.255 s, System: 0.946 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.405 s … 10.410 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.345 s ±  0.114 s    [User: 38.063 s, System: 0.937 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.264 s … 10.425 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.411 s ±  0.108 s    [User: 38.264 s, System: 0.971 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.334 s … 10.487 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.341 s ±  0.121 s    [User: 38.200 s, System: 0.936 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.255 s … 10.426 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.260 s ±  0.076 s    [User: 38.479 s, System: 1.045 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.207 s … 10.314 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.425 s ±  0.166 s    [User: 38.378 s, System: 1.115 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.308 s … 10.542 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.02 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.138 ± 0.014	2.121	2.166	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.132 ± 0.006	2.124	2.143	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.061 ± 0.010	2.042	2.071	1.01 ± 0.02
head big_fibonacci	2.050 ± 0.029	2.024	2.104	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.590 ± 0.121	7.451	7.816	1.00 ± 0.02
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.587 ± 0.039	7.540	7.668	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.200 ± 0.020	2.178	2.242	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.198 ± 0.026	2.180	2.269	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.451 ± 0.009	1.444	1.472	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.460 ± 0.015	1.442	1.489	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.223 ± 0.005	1.215	1.231	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.218 ± 0.006	1.212	1.233	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.679 ± 0.109	7.585	7.973	1.00 ± 0.02
head integration_builtins	7.643 ± 0.058	7.557	7.761	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.896 ± 0.027	7.855	7.938	1.00 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.893 ± 0.029	7.830	7.923	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.173 ± 0.018	2.155	2.214	1.00 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.171 ± 0.024	2.152	2.238	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.549 ± 0.018	1.529	1.584	1.01 ± 0.02
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.536 ± 0.017	1.521	1.580	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.496 ± 0.013	1.484	1.530	1.01 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.488 ± 0.015	1.472	1.524	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.228 ± 0.008	1.221	1.243	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.232 ± 0.019	1.219	1.283	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.602 ± 0.011	1.590	1.621	1.00 ± 0.01
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.595 ± 0.010	1.584	1.612	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	533.8 ± 2.1	531.8	539.4	1.00
head pedersen	533.9 ± 1.9	532.0	538.0	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	637.9 ± 3.7	632.9	645.0	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	639.5 ± 6.8	633.3	653.7	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.868 ± 0.009	1.859	1.884	1.01 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.858 ± 0.007	1.850	1.874	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	633.9 ± 5.8	627.2	646.7	1.01 ± 0.01
head set_integration_benchmark	629.3 ± 1.8	627.0	632.2	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.223 ± 0.018	4.193	4.247	1.00 ± 0.01
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.207 ± 0.039	4.169	4.306	1.00

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.53%. Comparing base (3aed532) to head (6bbd507).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2025   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.53%   96.53%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       42720    42720           
=======================================
  Hits        41241    41241           
  Misses       1479     1479           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.