Stav/use btmap

[Stavbe]

Use Btreemap instead of hashmap

Description

For deterministic iteration order in the adapter side.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

---

This change is 

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.294 s ±  0.053 s    [User: 25.491 s, System: 0.802 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.257 s … 26.332 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.243 s ±  0.082 s    [User: 25.432 s, System: 0.809 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.185 s … 26.301 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.803 s ±  0.166 s    [User: 25.758 s, System: 0.822 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.685 s … 14.920 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.582 s ±  0.046 s    [User: 25.564 s, System: 0.809 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.550 s … 14.615 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.02 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.507 s ±  0.159 s    [User: 38.566 s, System: 0.961 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.395 s … 10.619 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.630 s ±  0.366 s    [User: 37.628 s, System: 0.960 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.371 s … 10.889 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.589 s ±  0.272 s    [User: 38.366 s, System: 0.993 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.397 s … 10.781 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.652 s ±  0.216 s    [User: 37.880 s, System: 1.008 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.499 s … 10.805 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.402 s ±  0.077 s    [User: 38.508 s, System: 1.016 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.348 s … 10.457 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.246 s ±  0.184 s    [User: 38.396 s, System: 1.018 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.116 s … 10.377 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.02 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.308 s ±  0.084 s    [User: 38.816 s, System: 1.117 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.248 s … 10.368 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.299 s ±  0.146 s    [User: 38.853 s, System: 1.072 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.196 s … 10.402 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.00 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.126 ± 0.018	2.102	2.165	1.00
head big_factorial	2.136 ± 0.017	2.119	2.177	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.055 ± 0.011	2.042	2.075	1.00
head big_fibonacci	2.058 ± 0.011	2.042	2.076	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.546 ± 0.028	7.489	7.591	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.597 ± 0.015	7.566	7.609	1.01 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.170 ± 0.010	2.157	2.190	1.00
head compare_arrays_200000	2.183 ± 0.011	2.175	2.211	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.429 ± 0.004	1.424	1.434	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.433 ± 0.006	1.428	1.447	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.200 ± 0.004	1.196	1.207	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.218 ± 0.005	1.210	1.225	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.593 ± 0.032	7.552	7.663	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.686 ± 0.043	7.606	7.777	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.876 ± 0.125	7.781	8.162	1.00
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.933 ± 0.100	7.883	8.215	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.144 ± 0.021	2.120	2.181	1.00
head linear_search	2.144 ± 0.010	2.132	2.160	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.509 ± 0.004	1.500	1.513	1.00 ± 0.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.508 ± 0.005	1.501	1.515	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.452 ± 0.007	1.442	1.460	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.458 ± 0.006	1.449	1.471	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.219 ± 0.012	1.211	1.251	1.01 ± 0.01
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.212 ± 0.011	1.205	1.243	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.558 ± 0.004	1.552	1.565	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.577 ± 0.008	1.567	1.587	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	533.4 ± 1.0	531.6	534.7	1.00
head pedersen	536.0 ± 2.8	532.2	541.1	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	630.7 ± 3.3	622.2	634.3	1.00 ± 0.01
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	629.9 ± 5.5	622.1	637.7	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.851 ± 0.004	1.844	1.858	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.859 ± 0.005	1.852	1.867	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	662.5 ± 5.2	654.0	670.5	1.05 ± 0.01
head set_integration_benchmark	628.0 ± 1.9	624.7	631.2	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.155 ± 0.026	4.123	4.202	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.240 ± 0.040	4.201	4.334	1.02 ± 0.01

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.54%. Comparing base (63fa1b7) to head (0f78168).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2023   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.54%   96.54%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       42755    42755           
=======================================
  Hits        41276    41276           
  Misses       1479     1479           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[DavidLevitGurevich]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @FrancoGiachetta, @JulianGCalderon, and @yuvalsw)

[yuvalsw]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @FrancoGiachetta and @JulianGCalderon)

[JulianGCalderon]

This comment is repeated. Please remove it.

[Stavbe]

Done.

[Stavbe]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich and @JulianGCalderon)

[Stavbe]

Done.

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM

[Stavbe]

Hi @JulianGCalderon, you are blocking&approve

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich and @JulianGCalderon)

[JulianGCalderon]

Hi @JulianGCalderon, you are blocking&approve

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @DavidLevitGurevich and @JulianGCalderon)

I think that issue is related to reviewable. It shouldn't be a problem as from Github's point of view, I approved the PR.

[JulianGCalderon]

@Stavbe there are some Ci jobs failing. Could you fix them please?