Skip to content

[grouping] Consider storing metadata on GroupHash records #70454

Closed
@lobsterkatie

Description

@lobsterkatie

It's come up a couple times that it'd be great to have more information about how a particular GroupHash record came to be and/or came to be in its current state.

  • Grouping config version (would have to decide if it's first version to calculate that hash value or latest version)
  • If Seer is involved, the fact that the hash is represented in the Seer DB, Seer model version, parent hash (if any) - useful for display in the Grouping Info section of the issue details page, and for debugging the grouping of a given event.
  • If the issue's been merged, maybe the id the Activity record of the merge so we can get more data from that if desired
  • Possibly the grouping enhancements currently stored on each event (so that they don't have to be), maybe along with a dump of the stacktrace which was enhanced, and/or the full grouping info variants data (so we can know which hashes come from message vs stacktrace vs whatever)
  • Other things?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions