Skip to content

[Workers] Multi Workers development #23122

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: production
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

edmundhung
Copy link
Member

@edmundhung edmundhung commented Jun 19, 2025

Summary

This adds a Multi Worker development guide under Development & testing to showcase the different approaches to run multiple Workers locally and when to use each approach.

Screenshots (optional)

Documentation checklist

  • The documentation style guide has been adhered to.
  • If a larger change - such as adding a new page- an issue has been opened in relation to any incorrect or out of date information that this PR fixes.
  • Files which have changed name or location have been allocated redirects.

Copy link
Contributor

hyperlint-ai bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Howdy and thanks for contributing to our repo. The Cloudflare team reviews new, external PRs within two (2) weeks. If it's been two weeks or longer without any movement, please tag the PR Assignees in a comment.

We review internal PRs within 1 week. If it's something urgent or has been sitting without a comment, start a thread in the Developer Docs space internally.


PR Change Summary

Added a comprehensive guide on developing with multiple Workers, detailing various approaches and configurations.

  • Introduced a new guide for Multi Workers development.
  • Outlined methods for running multiple Workers in single and multiple processes.
  • Provided a hybrid approach for combining different Worker setups.
  • Included best practices for choosing between single and multiple process approaches.

Added Files

  • src/content/docs/workers/development-testing/multi-workers.mdx

How can I customize these reviews?

Check out the Hyperlint AI Reviewer docs for more information on how to customize the review.

If you just want to ignore it on this PR, you can add the hyperlint-ignore label to the PR. Future changes won't trigger a Hyperlint review.

Note specifically for link checks, we only check the first 30 links in a file and we cache the results for several hours (for instance, if you just added a page, you might experience this). Our recommendation is to add hyperlint-ignore to the PR to ignore the link check for this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

This pull request requires reviews from CODEOWNERS as it changes files that match the following patterns:

Pattern Owners
/src/content/docs/workers/ @cloudflare/workers-docs, @GregBrimble, @irvinebroque, @mikenomitch, @korinne, @WalshyDev, @cloudflare/deploy-config, @cloudflare/pcx-technical-writing, @kodster28, @cloudflare/wrangler, @cloudflare/workers-runtime-1, @cloudflare/wrangler

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@edmundhung edmundhung force-pushed the edmundhung/multi-workers-development branch 3 times, most recently from 67adec5 to 7ca0616 Compare June 20, 2025 18:45
@edmundhung edmundhung marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 18:51
@edmundhung edmundhung force-pushed the edmundhung/multi-workers-development branch from 7ca0616 to 9c8216b Compare June 20, 2025 19:06
Copy link
Contributor

CI run failed: build logs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
product:workers Related to Workers product size/m
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants