Updated a match expression to use an enum instead of dispatching on an integer #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…that was then matched on to instead use an enum.
brson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2013
Updated a match expression to use an enum instead of dispatching on an integer
|
Thanks! |
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2014
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2014
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2014
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of rust-lang#13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2015
This commit introduces the syntax for negative implmenetations of traits
as shown below:
`impl !Trait for Type {}`
cc rust-lang#13231
Part of RFC #3
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2015
Fix description of integer conversions
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2016
Add small-copy optimization for copy_from_slice ## Summary During benchmarking, I found that one of my programs spent between 5 and 10 percent of the time doing memmoves. Ultimately I tracked these down to single-byte slices being copied with a memcopy. Doing a manual copy if the slice contains only one element can speed things up significantly. For my program, this reduced the running time by 20%. ## Background I am optimizing a program that relies heavily on reading a single byte at a time. To avoid IO overhead, I read all data into a vector once, and then I use a `Cursor` around that vector to read from. During profiling, I noticed that `__memmove_avx_unaligned_erms` was hot, taking up 7.3% of the running time. It turns out that these were caused by calls to `Cursor::read()`, which calls `<&[u8] as Read>::read()`, which calls `&[T]::copy_from_slice()`, which calls `ptr::copy_nonoverlapping()`. This one is implemented as a memcopy. Copying a single byte with a memcopy is very wasteful, because (at least on my platform) it involves calling `memcpy` in libc. This is an indirect call when libc is linked dynamically, and furthermore `memcpy` is optimized for copying large amounts of data at the cost of a bit of overhead for small copies. ## Benchmarks Before I made this change, `perf` reported the following for my program. I only included the relevant functions, and how they rank. (This is on a different machine than where I ran the original benchmarks. It has an older CPU, so `__memmove_sse2_unaligned_erms` is called instead of `__memmove_avx_unaligned_erms`.) ``` #3 5.47% bench_decode libc-2.24.so [.] __memmove_sse2_unaligned_erms #5 1.67% bench_decode libc-2.24.so [.] memcpy@GLIBC_2.2.5 #6 1.51% bench_decode bench_decode [.] memcpy@plt ``` `memcpy` is eating up 8.65% of the total running time, and the overhead of dispatching to a specialized fast copy function (`memcpy@GLIBC` showing up) is clearly visible. The price of dynamic linking (`memcpy@plt` showing up) is visible too. After this change, this is what `perf` reports: ``` #5 0.33% bench_decode libc-2.24.so [.] __memmove_sse2_unaligned_erms #14 0.01% bench_decode libc-2.24.so [.] memcpy@GLIBC_2.2.5 ``` Now only 0.34% of the running time is spent on memcopies. The dynamic linking overhead is not significant at all any more. To add some more data, my program generates timing results for the operation in its main loop. These are the timings before and after the change: | Time before | Time after | After/Before | |---------------|---------------|--------------| | 29.8 ± 0.8 ns | 23.6 ± 0.5 ns | 0.79 ± 0.03 | The time is basically the total running time divided by a constant; the actual numbers are not important. This change reduced the total running time by 21% (much more than the original 9% spent on memmoves, likely because the CPU is stalling a lot less because data dependencies are more transparent). Of course YMMV and for most programs this will not matter at all. But when it does, the gains can be significant! ## Alternatives * At first I implemented this in `io::Cursor`. I moved it to `&[T]::copy_from_slice()` instead, but this might be too intrusive, especially because it applies to all `T`, not just `u8`. To restrict this to `io::Read`, `<&[u8] as Read>::read()` is probably the best place. * I tried copying bytes in a loop up to 64 or 8 bytes before calling `Read::read`, but both resulted in about a 20% slowdown instead of speedup.
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2017
LeakSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, AddressSanitizer and MemorySanitizer support
```
$ cargo new --bin leak && cd $_
$ edit Cargo.toml && tail -n3 $_
```
``` toml
[profile.dev]
opt-level = 1
```
```
$ edit src/main.rs && cat $_
```
``` rust
use std::mem;
fn main() {
let xs = vec![0, 1, 2, 3];
mem::forget(xs);
}
```
```
$ RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=leak" cargo run --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu; echo $?
Finished dev [optimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.0 secs
Running `target/debug/leak`
=================================================================
==10848==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 16 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x557c3488db1f in __interceptor_malloc /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/compiler-rt/lib/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cc:55
#1 0x557c34888aaa in alloc::heap::exchange_malloc::h68f3f8b376a0da42 /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/liballoc/heap.rs:138
#2 0x557c34888afc in leak::main::hc56ab767de6d653a $PWD/src/main.rs:4
#3 0x557c348c0806 in __rust_maybe_catch_panic ($PWD/target/debug/leak+0x3d806)
SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 16 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
23
```
```
$ cargo new --bin racy && cd $_
$ edit src/main.rs && cat $_
```
``` rust
use std::thread;
static mut ANSWER: i32 = 0;
fn main() {
let t1 = thread::spawn(|| unsafe { ANSWER = 42 });
unsafe {
ANSWER = 24;
}
t1.join().ok();
}
```
```
$ RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=thread" cargo run --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu; echo $?
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=12019)
Write of size 4 at 0x562105989bb4 by thread T1:
#0 racy::main::_$u7b$$u7b$closure$u7d$$u7d$::hbe13ea9e8ac73f7e $PWD/src/main.rs:6 (racy+0x000000010e3f)
#1 _$LT$std..panic..AssertUnwindSafe$LT$F$GT$$u20$as$u20$core..ops..FnOnce$LT$$LP$$RP$$GT$$GT$::call_once::h2e466a92accacc78 /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/libstd/panic.rs:296 (racy+0x000000010cc5)
#2 std::panicking::try::do_call::h7f4d2b38069e4042 /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/libstd/panicking.rs:460 (racy+0x00000000c8f2)
#3 __rust_maybe_catch_panic <null> (racy+0x0000000b4e56)
#4 std::panic::catch_unwind::h31ca45621ad66d5a /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/libstd/panic.rs:361 (racy+0x00000000b517)
#5 std::thread::Builder::spawn::_$u7b$$u7b$closure$u7d$$u7d$::hccfc37175dea0b01 /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/libstd/thread/mod.rs:357 (racy+0x00000000c226)
#6 _$LT$F$u20$as$u20$alloc..boxed..FnBox$LT$A$GT$$GT$::call_box::hd880bbf91561e033 /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/liballoc/boxed.rs:605 (racy+0x00000000f27e)
#7 std::sys::imp::thread::Thread::new::thread_start::hebdfc4b3d17afc85 <null> (racy+0x0000000abd40)
Previous write of size 4 at 0x562105989bb4 by main thread:
#0 racy::main::h23e6e5ca46d085c3 $PWD/src/main.rs:8 (racy+0x000000010d7c)
#1 __rust_maybe_catch_panic <null> (racy+0x0000000b4e56)
#2 __libc_start_main <null> (libc.so.6+0x000000020290)
Location is global 'racy::ANSWER::h543d2b139f819b19' of size 4 at 0x562105989bb4 (racy+0x0000002f8bb4)
Thread T1 (tid=12028, running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:902 (racy+0x00000001aedb)
#1 std::sys::imp::thread::Thread::new::hce44187bf4a36222 <null> (racy+0x0000000ab9ae)
#2 std::thread::spawn::he382608373eb667e /shared/rust/checkouts/lsan/src/libstd/thread/mod.rs:412 (racy+0x00000000b5aa)
#3 racy::main::h23e6e5ca46d085c3 $PWD/src/main.rs:6 (racy+0x000000010d5c)
#4 __rust_maybe_catch_panic <null> (racy+0x0000000b4e56)
#5 __libc_start_main <null> (libc.so.6+0x000000020290)
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race $PWD/src/main.rs:6 in racy::main::_$u7b$$u7b$closure$u7d$$u7d$::hbe13ea9e8ac73f7e
==================
ThreadSanitizer: reported 1 warnings
66
```
```
$ cargo new --bin oob && cd $_
$ edit src/main.rs && cat $_
```
``` rust
fn main() {
let xs = [0, 1, 2, 3];
let y = unsafe { *xs.as_ptr().offset(4) };
}
```
```
$ RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=address" cargo run --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu; echo $?
=================================================================
==13328==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fff29f3ecd0 at pc 0x55802dc6bf7e bp 0x7fff29f3ec90 sp 0x7fff29f3ec88
READ of size 4 at 0x7fff29f3ecd0 thread T0
#0 0x55802dc6bf7d in oob::main::h0adc7b67e5feb2e7 $PWD/src/main.rs:3
#1 0x55802dd60426 in __rust_maybe_catch_panic ($PWD/target/debug/oob+0xfe426)
#2 0x55802dd58dd9 in std::rt::lang_start::hb2951fc8a59d62a7 ($PWD/target/debug/oob+0xf6dd9)
#3 0x55802dc6c002 in main ($PWD/target/debug/oob+0xa002)
#4 0x7fad8c3b3290 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20290)
#5 0x55802dc6b719 in _start ($PWD/target/debug/oob+0x9719)
Address 0x7fff29f3ecd0 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 48 in frame
#0 0x55802dc6bd5f in oob::main::h0adc7b67e5feb2e7 $PWD/src/main.rs:1
This frame has 1 object(s):
[32, 48) 'xs' <== Memory access at offset 48 overflows this variable
HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism or swapcontext
(longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow $PWD/src/main.rs:3 in oob::main::h0adc7b67e5feb2e7
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x1000653dfd40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfd50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfd60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfd70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfd80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
=>0x1000653dfd90: 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00[f3]f3 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfda0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfdb0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfdc0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfdd0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x1000653dfde0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
Addressable: 00
Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Heap left redzone: fa
Heap right redzone: fb
Freed heap region: fd
Stack left redzone: f1
Stack mid redzone: f2
Stack right redzone: f3
Stack partial redzone: f4
Stack after return: f5
Stack use after scope: f8
Global redzone: f9
Global init order: f6
Poisoned by user: f7
Container overflow: fc
Array cookie: ac
Intra object redzone: bb
ASan internal: fe
Left alloca redzone: ca
Right alloca redzone: cb
==13328==ABORTING
1
```
```
$ cargo new --bin uninit && cd $_
$ edit src/main.rs && cat $_
```
``` rust
use std::mem;
fn main() {
let xs: [u8; 4] = unsafe { mem::uninitialized() };
let y = xs[0] + xs[1];
}
```
```
$ RUSTFLAGS="-Z sanitizer=memory" cargo run; echo $?
==30198==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x563f4b6867da in uninit::main::hc2731cd4f2ed48f8 $PWD/src/main.rs:5
#1 0x563f4b7033b6 in __rust_maybe_catch_panic ($PWD/target/debug/uninit+0x873b6)
#2 0x563f4b6fbd69 in std::rt::lang_start::hb2951fc8a59d62a7 ($PWD/target/debug/uninit+0x7fd69)
#3 0x563f4b6868a9 in main ($PWD/target/debug/uninit+0xa8a9)
#4 0x7fe844354290 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20290)
#5 0x563f4b6864f9 in _start ($PWD/target/debug/uninit+0xa4f9)
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value $PWD/src/main.rs:5 in uninit::main::hc2731cd4f2ed48f8
Exiting
77
```
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2017
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2017
Group "missing variable bind" spans in `or` matches and clarify wording for the two possible cases: when a variable from the first pattern is not in any of the subsequent patterns, and when a variable in any of the other patterns is not in the first one. Before: ``` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #2 --> file.rs:10:23 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `b` from pattern #2 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:32 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `b` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error[E0408]: variable `c` from pattern #3 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:43 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `c` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #4 --> file.rs:10:48 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error: aborting due to 6 previous errors ``` After: ``` error[E0408]: variable `a` is not bound in all patterns --> file.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { intln!("{:?}", a); } | - ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ - variable t in all patterns | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | variable not in all patterns error[E0408]: variable `d` is not bound in all patterns --> file.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { intln!("{:?}", a); } | - - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern esn't bind `d` | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `d` | | variable not in all patterns | variable not in all patterns error[E0408]: variable `b` is not bound in all patterns --> file.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { intln!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern esn't bind `b` | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `b` | | variable not in all patterns | pattern doesn't bind `b` error[E0408]: variable `c` is not bound in all patterns --> file.rs:20:48 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { intln!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^^^ pattern esn't bind `c` | | | | | | | variable not in all tterns | | pattern doesn't bind `c` | pattern doesn't bind `c` error: aborting due to 4 previous errors ``` * Have only one presentation for binding consistency errors * Point to same binding in multiple patterns when possible * Check inconsistent bindings in all arms * Simplify wording of diagnostic message * Sort emition and spans of binding errors for deterministic output
brson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2017
Clean up "pattern doesn't bind x" messages Group "missing variable bind" spans in `or` matches and clarify wording for the two possible cases: when a variable from the first pattern is not in any of the subsequent patterns, and when a variable in any of the other patterns is not in the first one. Before: ```rust error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #2 --> file.rs:10:23 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `b` from pattern #2 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:32 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `b` error[E0408]: variable `a` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `a` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #3 --> file.rs:10:37 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error[E0408]: variable `c` from pattern #3 is not bound in pattern #1 --> file.rs:10:43 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^ pattern doesn't bind `c` error[E0408]: variable `d` from pattern #1 is not bound in pattern #4 --> file.rs:10:48 | 10 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` error: aborting due to 6 previous errors ``` After: ```rust error[E0408]: variable `d` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | - - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `d` | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `d` | | variable not in all patterns | variable not in all patterns error[E0408]: variable `c` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:48 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `c` | | | | | | | variable not in all patterns | | pattern doesn't bind `c` | pattern doesn't bind `c` error[E0408]: variable `a` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | - ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ - variable not in all patterns | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | | pattern doesn't bind `a` | variable not in all patterns error[E0408]: variable `b` is not bound in all patterns --> $DIR/issue-39698.rs:20:37 | 20 | T::T1(a, d) | T::T2(d, b) | T::T3(c) | T::T4(a) => { println!("{:?}", a); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `b` | | | | | | | pattern doesn't bind `b` | | variable not in all patterns | pattern doesn't bind `b` error: aborting due to 4 previous errors ``` Fixes rust-lang#39698.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the resume_task_from_queue function a two-phase match expression is present, and I converted it from integer dispatch to using an enum as per the comment on the last pull request.