-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 500
Meetings: add 2018-07-12 & 2018-07-19 #576
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
7a4ef3c
to
494c83d
Compare
Added 2018-07-19 meeting since previous meeting notes didn't have any reviews yet. Preview: http://dg0.dtrt.org/en/meetings/2018/07/19/ For the topic about Bitcoin.org, I wrote a background and conclusion section but for the discussion section, I just linked to the log. That's not a subject about which I can credibly summarize in a dispassionate manner. I think just linking to the log here is fine, but if someone else wants to write a summary of the discussion, I'd be happy to include it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 494c83d. A few nits/comments inline, but this is good to go as-is.
For the Bitcoin.org topic, I've made some suggestions to change the wording, but I'll also recuse myself from writing the detailed log 😛
Several meeting participants listed things they'd like to get in that | ||
they're worried won't be complete before the freeze: | ||
|
||
- [New `scantxout` RPC][#12196], mentioned by Jonas Schnelli |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: The rendered link looks slightly odd. It's a matter of personal taste, but consider removing the backticks.
which of a user's bitcoins to spend in a particular transaction. The | ||
selected *Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs)*, often simply called | ||
*coins,* become *inputs* in the transaction. Developers have spent many | ||
hours in the past year improving Bitcoin Core's coin selection to be |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: many hours undersells this a bit! Many developer days or weeks would be closer to the mark.
[log coredev meet]: {{log}}#l-279 | ||
|
||
[meet osd]: /en/meetings/2018/06/28/#output-script-descriptors | ||
[osd gist]: https://gist.github.com/sipa/e3d23d498c430bb601c5bca83523fa82 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I sometimes worry that gists aren't stable links, since they feel more ephemeral. There's not really any alternative though, and better to link to this now and risk having it break in future than not link.
working for it. | ||
|
||
There are several seeder programs written by different authors. One of | ||
them is maintained by Pieter Wuille and is simply called `bitcoin-seeder`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add link to repo (https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin-seeder)?
|
||
## Moving away from Bitcoin.org | ||
|
||
**Background:** Since the 2009 release of the original Bitcoin software, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is ok, but some of the conjunctions are perhaps a little loaded (But over time..., so Bitcoin Core began.., etc)
I've made an attempt at rewriting the section. Feel free to take or leave:
Background: Since the 2009 release of the original Bitcoin software, Bitcoin (and later Bitcoin Core) resources have been hosted on Bitcoin.org. Over time, this was augmented with additional resources about the increasingly diverse Bitcoin network.
In December 2015 Bitcoin Core began using its own domain to host its resources, and later also to host its software releases. Release announcements and software continue to be mirrored to Bitcoin.org.
Discussion: Andrew Chow introduced the topic by suggesting "moving away from Bitcoin.org". He added "we still link to bitcoin.org for things like downloads. [We] should probably change those". See the [log][log bco] for the full discussion. Some discussion also occurred [after the meeting][post-meeting bco].
Conclusion: No explicit conclusion. Post-meeting discussion seemed to indicate no significant changes to the current process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Used this text verbatim except for two capitalization changes to match the style used elsewhere in the document. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good. Sorry, I've added one more nit.
they're worried won't be complete before the freeze: | ||
|
||
- [New scantxout RPC][#12196], mentioned by Jonas Schnelli | ||
- [New `disableprivatekey` setting][#9662] for watching-only wallets, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same feedback as the line above: remove backticks to avoid strange-looking link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I fixed, squashed and force-pushed this to not delay the merge. Hope that's ok @harding!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I assume so since you'd already done the same fix to the link above)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks! I'll wait another couple hours until around 16:00 EDT in case anyone else wants to comment, then merge.
Includes some text about Bitcoin.org written by John Newbery
c5495d1
to
2df5496
Compare
ACK 2df5496. Happy to have the fixup commit squashed (or not!) |
Could someone please create a singed merge commit of Otherwise, this will not be shown on the website. |
@MarcoFalke do you know of a way to do that? I played around, I don't see a way to convince git to let me merge things that are already part of the tree. This repository has its master branch protected against rewrites, so I can't reset to before the merge. The only way I know of to maybe fix this is to reset the trusted-git-root, which I'm reluctant to do and which may not work depending on how the build script works. @laanwj @jonasschnelli @btcdrak maybe you have access to revert master to HEAD^ so that this can be re-merged properly? (Or another solution to suggest.) Sorry for the miscommunication here. |
@harding untested gist:
|
Note that the |
Tree-SHA512: 2e1493b59570ef967f31ca605a1f336b976f287240c319b4c31357135b8b354afd6475820d201ca16f21502616676dc6f810ac6f707cc2f7c232bdc3190053f2
@MarcoFalke many thanks, that worked. Unfortunately, the repo permissions are setup not to allow pushes without Approved reviews, so I had to open PR #580 and will have to wait for @jnewbery to Approve it. I think (and hope) I should then be able to merge it as a fast-forward and push it manually to get the intended effect. |
Everything appears to be fixed now. Thanks again, @MarcoFalke. |
Preview: http://dg0.dtrt.org/en/meetings/2018/07/12/