-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add sycl doc #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add sycl doc #2
Conversation
…#134130) This should fix failures caused by llvm#133967 Attn: @sarnex Thanks Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
…d A520 (llvm#132246) Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, llvm#8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, llvm#32 add x11, x11, llvm#32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, llvm#32 ``` Which is more efficient.
… A510/A520 (llvm#134606) Recommit. This work was done by llvm#132246 but failed buildbots due to the test introduced needing updates Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add ``` void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) dst[i] = a[i] + b[i]; } ``` Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of instructions. ``` add x12, x1, x10 ld1b { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10] add x13, x2, x10 ld1b { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10] ldr z2, [x12, #1, mul vl] ldr z3, [x13, #1, mul vl] dech x11 add x12, x0, x10 fadd z0.s, z1.s, z0.s fadd z1.s, z3.s, z2.s st1b { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10] addvl x10, x10, #2 str z1, [x12, #1, mul vl] ``` By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop. ``` ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16] subs x13, x13, llvm#8 ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16] add x10, x10, llvm#32 add x11, x11, llvm#32 fadd v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s fadd v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16] add x12, x12, llvm#32 ``` Which is more efficient.
…ctor-bits=128." (llvm#134997) Reverts llvm#134068 Caused a stage 2 build failure: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/6016 ``` FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp Opcode has unknown scale! UNREACHABLE executed at ../llvm/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp:4530! PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp 1. <eof> parser at end of file 2. Code generation 3. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp'. 4. Running pass 'AArch64 load / store optimization pass' on function '@"_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFN4llvm8ExpectedISt8functionIFNS1_ISt10unique_ptrINS0_16CachedFileStreamESt14default_deleteIS4_EEEEjRKNS0_5TwineEEEEEjNS0_9StringRefESB_EZNS0_10localCacheESB_SB_SB_S2_IFvjSB_S3_INS0_12MemoryBufferES5_ISH_EEEEE3$_0E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataOjOSF_SB_"' #0 0x0000b6eae9b67bf0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c7bf0) #1 0x0000b6eae9b65aec llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c5aec) #2 0x0000b6eae9acd5f4 CrashRecoverySignalHandler(int) CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:0:0 #3 0x0000f16c1aff28f8 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x8f8) #4 0x0000f16c1aacf1f0 __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #5 0x0000f16c1aa8a67c gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #6 0x0000f16c1aa77130 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 llvm#7 0x0000b6eae9ad6628 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x8136628) llvm#8 0x0000b6eae72e95a8 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x59495a8) llvm#9 0x0000b6eae74ca9a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::findMatchingInsn(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, (anonymous namespace)::LdStPairFlags&, unsigned int, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 llvm#10 0x0000b6eae74c85a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::tryToPairLdStInst(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 llvm#11 0x0000b6eae74c624c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::optimizeBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 llvm#12 0x0000b6eae74c429c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0 ```
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a few comments, but I think quite a bit of work is needed on this.
- Some of what is documented will not be upstreamed at all; integration headers for example.
- Some of this seems premature to upstream; everything about specialization constants for example.
- We should ensure that the documentation doesn't favor SPIR-V; sections should be present for other target architectures even if we don't have content to add to them right now.
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ | |||
================================= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
llvm/docs
doesn't seem like the right location for this documentation. clang/docs
seems like a more appropriate location. There is already a SYCLSupport.rst
file there that discusses address spaces (and that probably needs review). The AMDGPUSupport.rst
file in that location will also need an update for SYCL (eventually).
virtual calls), generates LLVM IR bitcode for the device code only and | ||
"integration header" which provides information like kernel name, parameters | ||
order and data type for the runtime library. Multiple LLVM IR bitcodes (in case |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Integration header support will not be pushed upstream.
|
||
.. code-block:: console | ||
|
||
$ clang -cc1 -triple spirv64 -fsycl-is-device test.cpp -o test.bc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can device compilation be illustrated using the driver directly without using -cc1
? Perhaps with -fsycl-device-only
? This should also pass -aux-triple
to demonstrate the correlation with a host compilation.
|
||
Front-end device compilation for SYCL offloading can be split into the following | ||
components - Device code outlining, SYCL kernel function object lowering, | ||
Generation of device code diagnostics, and Integration header generation. These |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Integration header support will not be pushed upstream.
******************************************************** | ||
SYCL kernel function object (functor or lambda) lowering | ||
******************************************************** | ||
This component creates an OpenCL kernel function interface for SYCL kernels. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is OpenCL relevant for all device targets? I'm under the impression that it is not, for example when targeting nvptx and CUDA.
Clang will support SYCL target offloading to several different architectures | ||
such as Intel CPUs and GPUs, NVPTX, and AMDGPU. Offloading code is generated by | ||
clang and then executed using SYCL runtime. This section describes the steps | ||
necessary to create a functioning device image that can be loaded by the SYCL | ||
runtime. {{ SYCL runtime reference? }}. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be helpful to describe the relationship to OpenCL, CUDA, HIP, SPIR-V, etc... somewhere in this section.
**************************** | ||
Front-end device compilation | ||
**************************** | ||
This step parses input source, outlines device part of the code, applies | ||
additional restrictions on the device code (e.g. no exceptions or virtual | ||
calls), generates LLVM IR bitcode for the device code only and "integration | ||
header" which provides information like kernel name, parameters order and data | ||
type for the runtime library. Multiple LLVM IR bitcodes (in case of multiple | ||
targets) are packaged into a single object by the clang-offload-packager. | ||
|
||
An example of front-end device compilation command is shown below: | ||
|
||
.. code-block:: console | ||
|
||
$ clang -cc1 -triple spirv64 -fsycl-is-device test.cpp -o test.bc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This duplicates the text in llvm/docs/SYCLFrontEndDeviceCompilation.rst
.
The clang-offload-packager is run during ‘fat object’ generation regardless of | ||
the number of device binaries being added to the conglomerate fat object. The |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please avoid the "fat" terminology as it can have negative connotations. There was a suggestion to use "multiple architecture" terminology or similar in the initial libsycl PR.
Remainder of this section discusses the various post-link steps and the | ||
translation to SPIR-V IR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about PTX for NVIDIA and HSA for AMD?
SPIR-V friendly IR form is a special representation of LLVM IR, where some | ||
function are named in particular way in order to be recognizable by the SPIR-V | ||
translator to convert them into corresponding SPIR-V instructions later. | ||
The format is documented [here][spirv-friendly-ir] `spirv-friendly-ir <https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-LLVM-Translator/blob/master/docs/SPIRVRepresentationInLLVM.rst>`_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we planning to upstream this support? My understanding is that the new LLVM-IR replacements are in development.
…vailable (llvm#135343) When a frame is inlined, LLDB will display its name in backtraces as follows: ``` * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.3 * frame #0: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] baz(x=10) at inline.cpp:1:42 frame #1: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] bar() at inline.cpp:2:37 frame #2: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() at inline.cpp:4:15 frame #3: 0x00000001000003c0 a.out`main at inline.cpp:7:5 frame #4: 0x000000026eb29ab8 dyld`start + 6812 ``` The longer the names get the more confusing this gets because the first function name that appears is the parent frame. My assumption (which may need some more surveying) is that for the majority of cases we only care about the actual frame name (not the parent). So this patch removes all the special logic that prints the parent frame. Another quirk of the current format is that the inlined frame name does not abide by the `${function.name-XXX}` format variables. We always just print the raw demangled name. With this patch, we would format the inlined frame name according to the `frame-format` setting (see the test-cases). If we really want to have the `parentFrame [inlined] inlinedFrame` format, we could expose it through a new `frame-format` variable (e..g., `${function.inlined-at-name}` and let the user decide where to place things.
The linter messed up the order of includes, which is necessary as is.
No description provided.