Skip to content

fix: Use WeakHashMap for caching proxy classes #2260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions src/main/java/io/appium/java_client/proxy/Helpers.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
import java.util.WeakHashMap;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
import java.util.stream.Stream;

Expand All @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ public class Helpers {
// the performance and to avoid extensive memory usage for our case, where
// the amount of instrumented proxy classes we create is low in comparison to the amount
// of proxy instances.
private static final ConcurrentMap<ProxyClassSignature, Class<?>> CACHED_PROXY_CLASSES = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
private static final Map<ProxyClassSignature, Class<?>> CACHED_PROXY_CLASSES =
Collections.synchronizedMap(new WeakHashMap<>());

private Helpers() {
}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,20 +12,29 @@
import org.openqa.selenium.WebDriver;
import org.openqa.selenium.WebElement;

import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.stream.Stream;

import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toList;
import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.contains;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.lessThan;
import static org.openqa.selenium.support.PageFactory.initElements;


@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "unused"})
public class CombinedWidgetTest {

/**
* Based on how many Proxy Classes are created during this test class,
* this number is used to determine if the cache is being purged correctly between tests.
*/
private static final int THRESHOLD_SIZE = 50;

/**
* Test data generation.
*
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -57,6 +66,7 @@ public static Stream<Arguments> data() {
@ParameterizedTest
@MethodSource("data")
void checkThatWidgetsAreCreatedCorrectly(AbstractApp app, WebDriver driver, Class<?> widgetClass) {
assertProxyClassCacheGrowth();
initElements(new AppiumFieldDecorator(driver), app);
assertThat("Expected widget class was " + widgetClass.getName(),
app.getWidget().getSubWidget().getSelfReference().getClass(),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -161,4 +171,32 @@ public List<PartiallyCombinedWidget> getWidgets() {
return multipleWidgets;
}
}


/**
* Assert proxy class cache growth for this test class.
* The (@link io.appium.java_client.proxy.Helpers#CACHED_PROXY_CLASSES) should be populated during these tests.
* Prior to the Caching issue being resolved
* - the CACHED_PROXY_CLASSES would grow indefinitely, resulting in an Out Of Memory exception.
* - this ParameterizedTest would have the CACHED_PROXY_CLASSES grow to 266 entries.
*/
private void assertProxyClassCacheGrowth() {
System.gc(); //Trying to force a collection for more accurate check numbers
assertThat(
"Proxy Class Cache threshold is " + THRESHOLD_SIZE,
getCachedProxyClassesSize(),
lessThan(THRESHOLD_SIZE)
);
}

private int getCachedProxyClassesSize() {
try {
Field cpc = Class.forName("io.appium.java_client.proxy.Helpers").getDeclaredField("CACHED_PROXY_CLASSES");
cpc.setAccessible(true);
Map<?, ?> cachedProxyClasses = (Map<?, ?>) cpc.get(null);
return cachedProxyClasses.size();
} catch (NoSuchFieldException | ClassNotFoundException | IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}
Loading