Skip to content

Update generated code for DPF 261_rcs_header on master #2344

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

pyansys-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

An update of generated code has been triggered either manually or by an update in the dpf-standalone repository.

@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2025 13:09
@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot added the server-sync DO NOT USE, Related to automatic synchronization with the server label Jun 6, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.11%. Comparing base (6f8900e) to head (1b8046d).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2344      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.10%   84.11%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          91       91              
  Lines       10529    10538       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         8855     8864       +9     
  Misses       1674     1674              

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2025

The documentation for this pull request will be available at https://dpf.docs.pyansys.com/pull/2344. Please allow some time for the documentation to be deployed.

@rafacanton rafacanton closed this Jun 11, 2025
@rafacanton rafacanton deleted the maint/update_code_for_261_rcs_header_on_master branch June 11, 2025 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
server-sync DO NOT USE, Related to automatic synchronization with the server
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants