Description
Being that there is time on the schedule currently at the Feb 11th & 12th Wasm CG for debugging topics (see https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/master/2020/CG-02.md ), should we decide on potential topics?
Firstly, who will be present in person? Some key folks on topics are @yurydelendik (e.g. DWARF), @fitzgen (e.g. debug modules), @dschuff (e.g. LLVM related topics), @bmeurer and @pfaffe (various topics re the V8 debugger design), etc. If we're not going to have quorum, it may be more respectful to all involved and of the CG time to push forward on the issue tracker and video calls rather than at the meeting.
If we will have the right folks present, what are the priorities for discussion - bearing in mind what are "standards or recommendations relevant" discussions (rather than implementation details), and which of these most critical to land? Examples could include:
- Close on the debug format representations (e.g. agree on the DWARF + amendments (DWARF for WebAssembly Target #1) , custom names sections, how to reference "out-of-module" debug data, etc.)
- Try and move forward on the Wasm Debug Module work @fitzgen did, and if/how to align this with the Language Components proposed by @bmeurer (Wasm Language Components for browser DevTools #8).
- Discuss upcoming features (e.g. exceptions, multiple memories, interface types, etc.) and if these may fundamentally impact any of the designs around debugging we should consider now.
Thoughts?