-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 395
If no path is found or when using the -ScriptDefinition parameter set, default to the current location for the directory search of the implicit settings file #979
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…, default to the current location for the directory search of the implicit settings file
$violations = Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer -Path $project1Root -Recurse | ||
$violations.Count | Should -Be 1 | ||
$violations[0].RuleName | Should -Be "PSAvoidUsingCmdletAliases" | ||
} | ||
|
||
It "runs rules from the implicit setting file using the -ScriptDefinition parameter set" { | ||
Push-Location $project1Root |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you, please, explain what is happening in here? Why are we pushing the $project1Root?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to the test above I am testing that PSSA implicitly picks up the settings file (see feature description here). PSSA goes through various search paths like e.g. the supplied path (test above) or current working directory (this test/PR) or even the Desktop.
$violations = Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer -ScriptDefinition 'gci; Write-Host' -Recurse | ||
Pop-Location | ||
$violations.Count | Should -Be 1 | ||
$violations[0].RuleName | Should -Be "PSAvoidUsingCmdletAliases" ` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe Should -BeExactly, I think it should match the case as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we could use exact matching but I will need to apply that to surrounding test cases for consistency. I was wondering for a while if we should try to come up with a best practice example test template that we either document or even make a test helper method for it since nearly all PSSA tests are kind of the same...
PR Summary
Fixes #978. This allows usage of the implicit settings file when using the
-ScriptDefinition
parameter (or avoid a misleading error message about setting parsing when no file is found to be analysed). When no file path was found using the-Path
option or using the-ScriptDefinition
parameter set, the search for implicit setting files used to rely on a path being present. This PR fixes it to fallback to the current working directory as a search directory for implicit setting file.PR Checklist
Note: Tick the boxes below that apply to this pull request by putting an
x
between the square brackets. Please mark anything not applicable to this PRNA
.WIP:
to the beginning of the title and remove the prefix when the PR is ready