Skip to content

Exception: java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast to io.swagger.v3.oas.models.media.Schema #256

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
datstarkey opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #266
Closed
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@datstarkey
Copy link

Hi,

Tool has been great so far, it's been working really well for our microservice architecture but one of our api's comes up with this error when trying to get the differences:

Unexpected exception. Reason: java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast to io.swagger.v3.oas.models.media.Schema
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Boolean cannot be cast to io.swagger.v3.oas.models.media.Schema
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.schemadiffresult.SchemaDiffResult.compareAdditionalProperties(SchemaDiffResult.java:133)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.schemadiffresult.SchemaDiffResult.diff(SchemaDiffResult.java:78)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.SchemaDiff.computeDiff(SchemaDiff.java:316)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.SchemaDiff.computeDiff(SchemaDiff.java:27)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ReferenceDiffCache.cachedDiff(ReferenceDiffCache.java:44)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.SchemaDiff.diff(SchemaDiff.java:282)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ContentDiff.diff(ContentDiff.java:33)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ResponseDiff.computeDiff(ResponseDiff.java:50)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ResponseDiff.computeDiff(ResponseDiff.java:15)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ReferenceDiffCache.cachedDiff(ReferenceDiffCache.java:51)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ResponseDiff.diff(ResponseDiff.java:34)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.ApiResponseDiff.diff(ApiResponseDiff.java:32)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.OperationDiff.diff(OperationDiff.java:63)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.PathDiff.diff(PathDiff.java:35)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.PathsDiff.lambda$diff$3(PathsDiff.java:83)
        at java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedKeySet.forEach(LinkedHashMap.java:559)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.PathsDiff.diff(PathsDiff.java:41)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.OpenApiDiff.compare(OpenApiDiff.java:95)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.compare.OpenApiDiff.compare(OpenApiDiff.java:66)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.OpenApiCompare.fromSpecifications(OpenApiCompare.java:101)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.OpenApiCompare.fromLocations(OpenApiCompare.java:90)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.core.OpenApiCompare.fromLocations(OpenApiCompare.java:77)
        at org.openapitools.openapidiff.cli.Main.main(Main.java:156)

Any help is apprecitated, many thanks.
Jake

@joschi
Copy link
Contributor

joschi commented Aug 17, 2021

@datstarkey Thanks for reporting!

Could you provide your OpenAPI spec(s) or a reduced version of the OpenAPI spec(s) to build a reproduction case? You can redact/anonymize the contents of the OpenAPI specs as long as they trigger the bug you've reported.

@joschi joschi added the bug label Aug 17, 2021
@joschi joschi added this to the Release 2.0.0 milestone Aug 17, 2021
@datstarkey
Copy link
Author

newVersionJson.txt
oldVersionjson.txt

I've attached them both json objects as text files here, comparing these two is giving me the error.

Thanks

@joschi
Copy link
Contributor

joschi commented Sep 30, 2021

@datstarkey Thanks for reporting this! The issue will be fixed in the next beta of OpenAPI-diff 2.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants