Skip to content

Feature/move to support net standard20 #6

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 23, 2021

Conversation

MartinCarpentier
Copy link
Contributor

Added net462 as a target framework to the tests so that we test this .net version aswell.

This also required moving the testrunner to test on windows-latest.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #6 (cab67ce) into main (eba1551) will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #6      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.96%   59.09%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines         753      753              
  Branches      192      192              
==========================================
+ Hits          444      445       +1     
+ Misses        222      221       -1     
  Partials       87       87              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 59.09% <ø> (+0.13%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/GeoJSON.Text/GeoJSONObject.cs 37.03% <0.00%> (+3.70%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eba1551...cab67ce. Read the comment docs.

@MartinCarpentier MartinCarpentier merged commit 5576f16 into main Dec 23, 2021
@MartinCarpentier MartinCarpentier deleted the feature/move-to-support-net-standard20 branch December 27, 2021 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants