|
| 1 | +diff --git a/Configurations/10-main.conf b/Configurations/10-main.conf |
| 2 | +index 59234a8a5..68b83af34 100644 |
| 3 | +--- a/Configurations/10-main.conf |
| 4 | ++++ b/Configurations/10-main.conf |
| 5 | +@@ -878,97 +878,6 @@ sub vms_info { |
| 6 | + ranlib => "true", |
| 7 | + }, |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +-#### Android: linux-* but without pointers to headers and libs. |
| 10 | +- # |
| 11 | +- # It takes pair of prior-set environment variables to make it work: |
| 12 | +- # |
| 13 | +- # CROSS_SYSROOT=/some/where/android-ndk-<ver>/platforms/android-<apiver>/arch-<arch> |
| 14 | +- # CROSS_COMPILE=<prefix> |
| 15 | +- # |
| 16 | +- # As well as PATH adjusted to cover ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc and company. |
| 17 | +- # For example to compile for ICS and ARM with NDK 10d, you'd: |
| 18 | +- # |
| 19 | +- # ANDROID_NDK=/some/where/android-ndk-10d |
| 20 | +- # CROSS_SYSROOT=$ANDROID_NDK/platforms/android-14/arch-arm |
| 21 | +- # CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-adroideabi- |
| 22 | +- # PATH=$ANDROID_NDK/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.8/prebuild/linux-x86_64/bin |
| 23 | +- # |
| 24 | +- "android" => { |
| 25 | +- inherit_from => [ "linux-generic32" ], |
| 26 | +- # Special note about unconditional -fPIC and -pie. The underlying |
| 27 | +- # reason is that Lollipop refuses to run non-PIE. But what about |
| 28 | +- # older systems and NDKs? -fPIC was never problem, so the only |
| 29 | +- # concern is -pie. Older toolchains, e.g. r4, appear to handle it |
| 30 | +- # and binaries turn mostly functional. "Mostly" means that oldest |
| 31 | +- # Androids, such as Froyo, fail to handle executable, but newer |
| 32 | +- # systems are perfectly capable of executing binaries targeting |
| 33 | +- # Froyo. Keep in mind that in the nutshell Android builds are |
| 34 | +- # about JNI, i.e. shared libraries, not applications. |
| 35 | +- cflags => add(picker(default => "-mandroid -fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack")), |
| 36 | +- bin_cflags => "-pie", |
| 37 | +- }, |
| 38 | +- "android-x86" => { |
| 39 | +- inherit_from => [ "android", asm("x86_asm") ], |
| 40 | +- cflags => add(picker(release => "-fomit-frame-pointer")), |
| 41 | +- bn_ops => "BN_LLONG", |
| 42 | +- perlasm_scheme => "android", |
| 43 | +- }, |
| 44 | +- ################################################################ |
| 45 | +- # Contemporary Android applications can provide multiple JNI |
| 46 | +- # providers in .apk, targeting multiple architectures. Among |
| 47 | +- # them there is "place" for two ARM flavours: generic eabi and |
| 48 | +- # armv7-a/hard-float. However, it should be noted that OpenSSL's |
| 49 | +- # ability to engage NEON is not constrained by ABI choice, nor |
| 50 | +- # is your ability to call OpenSSL from your application code |
| 51 | +- # compiled with floating-point ABI other than default 'soft'. |
| 52 | +- # [Latter thanks to __attribute__((pcs("aapcs"))) declaration.] |
| 53 | +- # This means that choice of ARM libraries you provide in .apk |
| 54 | +- # is driven by application needs. For example if application |
| 55 | +- # itself benefits from NEON or is floating-point intensive, then |
| 56 | +- # it might be appropriate to provide both libraries. Otherwise |
| 57 | +- # just generic eabi would do. But in latter case it would be |
| 58 | +- # appropriate to |
| 59 | +- # |
| 60 | +- # ./Configure android-armeabi -D__ARM_MAX_ARCH__=8 |
| 61 | +- # |
| 62 | +- # in order to build "universal" binary and allow OpenSSL take |
| 63 | +- # advantage of NEON when it's available. |
| 64 | +- # |
| 65 | +- "android-armeabi" => { |
| 66 | +- inherit_from => [ "android", asm("armv4_asm") ], |
| 67 | +- }, |
| 68 | +- "android-mips" => { |
| 69 | +- inherit_from => [ "android", asm("mips32_asm") ], |
| 70 | +- perlasm_scheme => "o32", |
| 71 | +- }, |
| 72 | +- |
| 73 | +- "android64" => { |
| 74 | +- inherit_from => [ "linux-generic64" ], |
| 75 | +- cflags => add(picker(default => "-mandroid -fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack")), |
| 76 | +- bin_cflags => "-pie", |
| 77 | +- }, |
| 78 | +- "android64-aarch64" => { |
| 79 | +- inherit_from => [ "android64", asm("aarch64_asm") ], |
| 80 | +- perlasm_scheme => "linux64", |
| 81 | +- }, |
| 82 | +- "android64-x86_64" => { |
| 83 | +- inherit_from => [ "android64", asm("x86_64_asm") ], |
| 84 | +- perlasm_scheme => "elf", |
| 85 | +- }, |
| 86 | +- "android64-mips64" => { |
| 87 | +- ############################################################ |
| 88 | +- # You are more than likely have to specify target processor |
| 89 | +- # on ./Configure command line. Trouble is that toolchain's |
| 90 | +- # default is MIPS64r6 (at least in r10d), but there are no |
| 91 | +- # such processors around (or they are too rare to spot one). |
| 92 | +- # Actual problem is that MIPS64r6 is binary incompatible |
| 93 | +- # with previous MIPS ISA versions, in sense that unlike |
| 94 | +- # prior versions original MIPS binary code will fail. |
| 95 | +- # |
| 96 | +- inherit_from => [ "android64", asm("mips64_asm") ], |
| 97 | +- perlasm_scheme => "64", |
| 98 | +- }, |
| 99 | +- |
| 100 | + #### *BSD |
| 101 | + "BSD-generic32" => { |
| 102 | + # As for thread cflag. Idea is to maintain "collective" set of |
| 103 | +diff --git a/Configurations/20-android.conf b/Configurations/20-android.conf |
| 104 | +new file mode 100644 |
| 105 | +index 000000000..ce11a5ae3 |
| 106 | +--- /dev/null |
| 107 | ++++ b/Configurations/20-android.conf |
| 108 | +@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ |
| 109 | ++#### Android: linux-* but without pointers to headers and libs. |
| 110 | ++ |
| 111 | ++%targets = ( |
| 112 | ++ # |
| 113 | ++ # It takes pair of prior-set environment variables to make it work: |
| 114 | ++ # |
| 115 | ++ # CROSS_SYSROOT=/some/where/android-ndk-<ver>/platforms/android-<apiver>/arch-<arch> |
| 116 | ++ # CROSS_COMPILE=<prefix> |
| 117 | ++ # |
| 118 | ++ # As well as PATH adjusted to cover ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc and company. |
| 119 | ++ # For example to compile for ICS and ARM with NDK 10d, you'd: |
| 120 | ++ # |
| 121 | ++ # ANDROID_NDK=/some/where/android-ndk-10d |
| 122 | ++ # CROSS_SYSROOT=$ANDROID_NDK/platforms/android-14/arch-arm |
| 123 | ++ # CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-adroideabi- |
| 124 | ++ # PATH=$ANDROID_NDK/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.8/prebuild/linux-x86_64/bin |
| 125 | ++ # |
| 126 | ++ "android-base" => { |
| 127 | ++ inherit_from => [ "linux-generic32" ], |
| 128 | ++ template => 1, |
| 129 | ++ # Special note about unconditional -fPIC and -pie. The underlying |
| 130 | ++ # reason is that Lollipop refuses to run non-PIE. But what about |
| 131 | ++ # older systems and NDKs? -fPIC was never problem, so the only |
| 132 | ++ # concern is -pie. Older toolchains, e.g. r4, appear to handle it |
| 133 | ++ # and binaries turn mostly functional. "Mostly" means that oldest |
| 134 | ++ # Androids, such as Froyo, fail to handle executable, but newer |
| 135 | ++ # systems are perfectly capable of executing binaries targeting |
| 136 | ++ # Froyo. Keep in mind that in the nutshell Android builds are |
| 137 | ++ # about JNI, i.e. shared libraries, not applications. |
| 138 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack")), |
| 139 | ++ bin_cflags => "-pie", |
| 140 | ++ }, |
| 141 | ++ "android-x86-base" => { |
| 142 | ++ inherit_from => [ asm("x86_asm") ], |
| 143 | ++ template => 1, |
| 144 | ++ cflags => add(picker(release => "-fomit-frame-pointer")), |
| 145 | ++ bn_ops => "BN_LLONG", |
| 146 | ++ perlasm_scheme => "android", |
| 147 | ++ }, |
| 148 | ++ ################################################################ |
| 149 | ++ # Contemporary Android applications can provide multiple JNI |
| 150 | ++ # providers in .apk, targeting multiple architectures. Among |
| 151 | ++ # them there is "place" for two ARM flavours: generic eabi and |
| 152 | ++ # armv7-a/hard-float. However, it should be noted that OpenSSL's |
| 153 | ++ # ability to engage NEON is not constrained by ABI choice, nor |
| 154 | ++ # is your ability to call OpenSSL from your application code |
| 155 | ++ # compiled with floating-point ABI other than default 'soft'. |
| 156 | ++ # [Latter thanks to __attribute__((pcs("aapcs"))) declaration.] |
| 157 | ++ # This means that choice of ARM libraries you provide in .apk |
| 158 | ++ # is driven by application needs. For example if application |
| 159 | ++ # itself benefits from NEON or is floating-point intensive, then |
| 160 | ++ # it might be appropriate to provide both libraries. Otherwise |
| 161 | ++ # just generic eabi would do. But in latter case it would be |
| 162 | ++ # appropriate to |
| 163 | ++ # |
| 164 | ++ # ./Configure android-armeabi -D__ARM_MAX_ARCH__=8 |
| 165 | ++ # |
| 166 | ++ # in order to build "universal" binary and allow OpenSSL take |
| 167 | ++ # advantage of NEON when it's available. |
| 168 | ++ # |
| 169 | ++ "android-armeabi-base" => { |
| 170 | ++ inherit_from => [ asm("armv4_asm") ], |
| 171 | ++ template => 1, |
| 172 | ++ }, |
| 173 | ++ "android-mips-base" => { |
| 174 | ++ inherit_from => [ asm("mips32_asm") ], |
| 175 | ++ template => 1, |
| 176 | ++ perlasm_scheme => "o32", |
| 177 | ++ }, |
| 178 | ++ |
| 179 | ++ "android64-base" => { |
| 180 | ++ inherit_from => [ "linux-generic64" ], |
| 181 | ++ template => 1, |
| 182 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-fPIC --sysroot=\$(CROSS_SYSROOT) -Wa,--noexecstack")), |
| 183 | ++ bin_cflags => "-pie", |
| 184 | ++ }, |
| 185 | ++ "android64-aarch64-base" => { |
| 186 | ++ inherit_from => [ asm("aarch64_asm") ], |
| 187 | ++ template => 1, |
| 188 | ++ perlasm_scheme => "linux64", |
| 189 | ++ }, |
| 190 | ++ "android64-x86_64-base" => { |
| 191 | ++ inherit_from => [ asm("x86_64_asm") ], |
| 192 | ++ template => 1, |
| 193 | ++ perlasm_scheme => "elf", |
| 194 | ++ }, |
| 195 | ++ "android64-mips64-base" => { |
| 196 | ++ ############################################################ |
| 197 | ++ # You are more than likely have to specify target processor |
| 198 | ++ # on ./Configure command line. Trouble is that toolchain's |
| 199 | ++ # default is MIPS64r6 (at least in r10d), but there are no |
| 200 | ++ # such processors around (or they are too rare to spot one). |
| 201 | ++ # Actual problem is that MIPS64r6 is binary incompatible |
| 202 | ++ # with previous MIPS ISA versions, in sense that unlike |
| 203 | ++ # prior versions original MIPS binary code will fail. |
| 204 | ++ # |
| 205 | ++ inherit_from => [ asm("mips64_asm") ], |
| 206 | ++ template => 1, |
| 207 | ++ perlasm_scheme => "64", |
| 208 | ++ }, |
| 209 | ++ |
| 210 | ++ # GCC targets |
| 211 | ++ "android" => { |
| 212 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android-base" ], |
| 213 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-mandroid")), |
| 214 | ++ }, |
| 215 | ++ "android-x86" => { |
| 216 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android", "android-x86-base" ], |
| 217 | ++ }, |
| 218 | ++ "android-armeabi" => { |
| 219 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android", "android-armeabi-base" ], |
| 220 | ++ }, |
| 221 | ++ "android-mips" => { |
| 222 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android", "android-mips-base" ], |
| 223 | ++ }, |
| 224 | ++ "android64" => { |
| 225 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64-base" ], |
| 226 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-mandroid")), |
| 227 | ++ }, |
| 228 | ++ "android64-aarch64" => { |
| 229 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64", "android64-aarch64-base" ], |
| 230 | ++ }, |
| 231 | ++ "android64-x86_64" => { |
| 232 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64", "android64-x86_64-base" ], |
| 233 | ++ }, |
| 234 | ++ "android64-mips64" => { |
| 235 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64", "android64-mips64-base" ], |
| 236 | ++ }, |
| 237 | ++ |
| 238 | ++ # Clang targets |
| 239 | ++ "android-clang" => { |
| 240 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android-base" ], |
| 241 | ++ cc => "clang", |
| 242 | ++ cxx => "clang++", |
| 243 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-gcc-toolchain \$(GCC_TOOLCHAIN) -D__ANDROID_API__=\$(ANDROID_API_LEVEL)")), |
| 244 | ++ bin_cflags => add(picker(default => "--sysroot=\$(ARCH_SYSROOT)")), |
| 245 | ++ shared_ldflag => add(picker(default => "-pie --sysroot=\$(ARCH_SYSROOT)")), |
| 246 | ++ }, |
| 247 | ++ "android-x86-clang" => { |
| 248 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android-clang", "android-x86-base" ], |
| 249 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-target i686-none-linux-android -I\$(CROSS_SYSROOT)/include/i686-linux-android -fno-integrated-as")), |
| 250 | ++ }, |
| 251 | ++ "android-armeabi-clang" => { |
| 252 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android-clang", "android-armeabi-base" ], |
| 253 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-target armv7-none-linux-androideabi -I\$(CROSS_SYSROOT)/include/arm-linux-androideabi -fno-integrated-as")), |
| 254 | ++ }, |
| 255 | ++ "android-mips-clang" => { |
| 256 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android-clang", "android-mips-base" ], |
| 257 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-target mipsel-none-linux-android -I\$(CROSS_SYSROOT)/include/mipsel-linux-android -fno-integrated-as")), |
| 258 | ++ }, |
| 259 | ++ "android64-clang" => { |
| 260 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64-base" ], |
| 261 | ++ cc => "clang", |
| 262 | ++ cxx => "clang++", |
| 263 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-gcc-toolchain \$(GCC_TOOLCHAIN) -D__ANDROID_API__=\$(ANDROID_API_LEVEL)")), |
| 264 | ++ bin_cflags => add(picker(default => "--sysroot=\$(ARCH_SYSROOT)")), |
| 265 | ++ shared_ldflag => add(picker(default => "-pie --sysroot=\$(ARCH_SYSROOT)")), |
| 266 | ++ }, |
| 267 | ++ "android64-aarch64-clang" => { |
| 268 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64-clang", "android64-aarch64-base" ], |
| 269 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-target aarch64-none-linux-android -I\$(CROSS_SYSROOT)/include/aarch64-linux-android -fno-integrated-as")), |
| 270 | ++ }, |
| 271 | ++ "android64-x86_64-clang" => { |
| 272 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64-clang", "android64-x86_64-base" ], |
| 273 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-target x86_64-none-linux-android -I\$(CROSS_SYSROOT)/include/x86_64-linux-android")), |
| 274 | ++ }, |
| 275 | ++ "android64-mips64-clang" => { |
| 276 | ++ inherit_from => [ "android64-clang", "android64-mips64-base" ], |
| 277 | ++ cflags => add(picker(default => "-target mips64el-none-linux-android -I\$(CROSS_SYSROOT)/include/mips64el-linux-android")), |
| 278 | ++ }, |
| 279 | ++); |
0 commit comments