-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 623
Maxima fails to recognize some expressions as equal #15395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Comments
comment:5
I don't know when it happened, but in 6.4.1 the limit works:
but the comparison
is still wrong. Slightly minified example:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Stopgaps: wrongAnswerMarker |
comment:8
Unchanged after #30063 Maxima 5.44.0 |
comment:9
Thanks very much for checking up on all these old tickets. |
comment:11
Sage development has entered the release candidate phase for 9.3. Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Maxima fails to regard some expressions as equal:
while
Previous description:
I tried to define Fibonacci sequence using golden ratio in two ways, using values:
(gives true, so two definitions, F1 and F2 below should be equal, even though they are not according to Sage)
When simplified everything seems to be equal at least for first 10 or 1000 elements:
Anyway, now to the error: limit for F1 gives wrong result:
and for F2 works OK:
I've tested it with Sage 5.12 and 5.11, with same result. This can be as simple as some thing with how golden ratio is handled, or something far more involved maybe?
CC: @kcrisman @sagetrac-jakobkroeker
Component: calculus
Keywords: limit, golden_ratio
Stopgaps: wrongAnswerMarker
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15395
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: