You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently this makes a vector over callable symbolic expressions: f(x,y,z)=(x<sup>2,y</sup>2,x*z*y). But this doesn't work: f(x,y,z)=vector([x<sup>2,y</sup>2,x*z*y]). This means that it's painful to do calculations on symbolic vectors and easily make new vector valued functions.
They are related, but different, I think. #11180 is about allow the f in the description to take a vector as an input; this one is about creating a new function using a vector. Best to keep them separate.
Currently this makes a vector over callable symbolic expressions:
f(x,y,z)=(x<sup>2,y</sup>2,x*z*y)
. But this doesn't work:f(x,y,z)=vector([x<sup>2,y</sup>2,x*z*y])
. This means that it's painful to do calculations on symbolic vectors and easily make new vector valued functions.CC: @kcrisman @jvkersch @mforets
Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11507
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: