You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be better if the DWARF represented the difference via tags or attributes, and not just the type name. One way would be to emit references as DW_TAG_reference_type, and save DW_TAG_pointer_type for raw pointers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a test program that does
&x
and&x as *const i32
. The only difference in the generated DWARF is the name of the pointer type:I think it would be better if the DWARF represented the difference via tags or attributes, and not just the type name. One way would be to emit references as
DW_TAG_reference_type
, and saveDW_TAG_pointer_type
for raw pointers.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: