-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[META][X86] Improve implementation and use of X86 scheduler models #31672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
mentioned in issue #31673 |
mentioned in issue #31778 |
mentioned in issue #31834 |
mentioned in issue #32148 |
mentioned in issue #32204 |
mentioned in issue #34510 |
mentioned in issue #34894 |
mentioned in issue #34897 |
mentioned in issue #34896 |
mentioned in issue #34935 |
mentioned in issue #34937 |
mentioned in issue #34936 |
mentioned in issue #34939 |
mentioned in issue #34938 |
mentioned in issue #34954 |
mentioned in issue #34960 |
mentioned in issue #34956 |
mentioned in issue #34958 |
mentioned in issue #34987 |
mentioned in issue #34991 |
mentioned in issue #35023 |
mentioned in issue #35024 |
mentioned in issue #35062 |
mentioned in issue #35061 |
mentioned in issue #35132 |
mentioned in issue #35296 |
mentioned in issue #35304 |
mentioned in issue #35327 |
mentioned in issue #35358 |
mentioned in issue #35432 |
Closing - replacing this near useless meta with a label instead |
Extended Description
Meta ticket covering issues with the x86 scheduler models, which currently include:
X86ScheduleAtom.td
X86SchedSandyBridge.td
X86SchedHaswell.td
X86ScheduleSLM.td
X86ScheduleBtVer2.td
Including incorrect latency/throughput values and resources.
Also covers possible improvements to how we can use the schedulers to improve performance (e.g. use in the machine combiner for better instruction selection).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: